Do you think it's possible to argue a point effectively even while disbelieving your

1 answer:

8 0

I do it is possible,if you believe something but the other side of the argument has more evidence or logically make more sense, you would still argue because it is your opinion and your belief, therefor you would want to explain it.

You might be interested in

write an imaginary conversation between nelson mandela and anne frank. imagine that Nelson Mandela and Anne Frank meet in the af

Sindrei [870]

Conversation is frank is talking to someone

5 0

3 years ago

Imagine that you have been asked to speak at a pep rally for your high school’s football team on the day of a big game. You will

anzhelika [568]

Answer:

Explanation:

1. Intrapersonal - speaking to such a large group of my peers will require me to develop a great deal of confidence

2. Social - being the center of attention will help me practice entertaining others in a group setting, thus helping me make friends more easily

3. Academic - preparing for the presentation will help hone my researching skills, and delivering the speech will help me overcome my fear of giving presentations in front of the class

4. Career - learning how to give this sort of informational and motivational presentation may come in handy in a job someday when I have to give a presentation to my boss and coworkers

6 0

3 years ago

In “The Most Dangerous Game” and “The Sniper”, Rainsford and the sniper both pursue their prey knowing if they don’t kill them,

Korvikt [17]

In “The Most Dangerous Game” and “The Sniper”, the protagonists (Rainsford and The Sniper, respectively) share the similarity that both are both sneaky and intelligent while having to deal with a life or death situation against and antagonist. The differences between both short stories protagonist are that Rainsford see humans as superior to animals at the beginning and is scared about killing, while The Sniper does not have this ideology and its actually excited about killing. The end of “The Most Dangerous Game” implies that Rainsford was successfull at defeating his enemy as he observes that "he had never slept in a better bed". On the other hand, The Sniper has a dramatic end has the protagonist noticed that he killed his brother.

3 0

4 years ago

Which sentences use correct pronoun case? Select two options. He thinks the culprit is Jimmy whom was at the store last night. W

Zina [86]

Answer:

"The program was written by Sara, who is an expert in her field."

"To whom should I talk to about the report?"

Explanation:

Who is a pronoun that represents the subject of a sentence:

Who would like to go to the supermarket?
Who built that castle?

Whom is a pronoun that represents the object of either a verb or a preposition:

To whom was the song dedicated?
Whom do you trust?
I am not sure with whom I will go to the concert.

By replacing the pronoun with he/she or him/her it is easier to realize its function:

Who/whom took my laptop?

He took my laptop (RIGHT) - him took my laptop (wrong)

So in this case, the correct pronoun to use is who.

Who/whom should I talk to about the issue with my boss?

I should talk to he (wrong) - I should talk to him. (RIGHT)

Here, the correct pronoun to use is whom.

7 0

3 years ago

Fred came running toward them. simple compound complex compound-complex

Contact [7]

In the sentence: Fred came running toward them.

This is a simple sentence. Because there is only one thought.

Sentences may be simple (one independent clause), compound (two independent clause with coordinating conjunction), complex (a subordinate & independent clause) and compound-complex sentences (subordinate & two independent clause). The benefit of complex or compound sentences is that it could give you more explanation on the subject or topic of the sentence. This gives you a much more understanding on what the sentence is trying to portray or to message to give.

5 0

4 years ago