A long time ago, pamphlets were all there was. There was no tv, wifi, internet. Most people can't even read or write so only pamphlets was the only thing that can reach a lot of people.
I think it’s letter b so significantly
After reading the poem "Sea Rose" by Hilda Doolittle, we can answer the questions in the following manner:
Part A
3. The sea rose, even with its acrid scent, is more endearing than the traditional rose.
Part B
1. "more precious / than a wet rose / single on a stem-"
- In her poem "Sea Rose," Hilda Doolittle praises the qualities of a sea rose over those of a regular rose.
- We all know roses: how beautiful and fragrant they are. They are often associated with love, tenderness, and softness.
- The sea rose, on the other hand, is "marred", "harsh", "meagre".
- It does not look as good as the regular rose, but there is where its beauty and importance lie.
- The sea rose is strong - it has survived a great ordeal. Nature itself has beaten it, "flung" and "caught" it.
- The sea rose, with all its flaws, ends up being more precious than other roses.
Learn more about the topic here:
brainly.com/question/12868634?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
1.is 2.stand 3.is 4. are 5. sits 6.is 7.is 8. is 9.wait 10.is
Answer:
The controlling idea of the text is that Simon Schama thinks and believes that William Shakespeare and the question of his authorship for some of his famous works of art is a question that needs no authenticity. Though some may believe that he is not capable of producing such 'famous works' considering his upbringing and education, his life experiences and 'imaginative creativity' helped him become who he was and is more than most of us too.
Explanation:
The controlling idea of any text is the opinion or the direction in which the author is taking the argument forward. This means that it contains the personal opinion and feelings of the writer about the topic of the text.
In the essay "The Shakespeare Showdown," author Simon Schama presents his opinion that there are many who question the authenticity of numerous literary texts that were written by William Shakespeare. Some even pointed out that Shakespeare is not 'intelligent' enough to have written them. But Simon believes that Shakespeare is indeed capable of writing those contested works.
While some may opine that <em>"[Shakespeare's] cultural provenance was too lowly, and his education too rudimentary, to have allowed him to penetrate the minds of kings and courtiers"</em>, there is no doubt that his <em>"capacity for imaginative extension was socially limitless",</em> thus helping him become who he is today. And in the words of William Hazlitt, <em>"He was nothing in himself, but he was all that others were, or that they could become."
</em>
Thus, the controlling idea of this text is that Shakespeare was and is indeed someone capable of authoring those 'contested' books and is more too.
