Answer:
Option 3 is the answer - 3-They tend to compromise and cooperate with the establishment.
Explanation:
Environmental activists and authors have accused the "group of 10" environmental organizations of abandoning long-lasting solutions to impacts global warming to side with some of the most notorious polluters in recent times. These organizations, who were said to be receiving monetary donations from ordinary concerned American citizens for their good works, now operate as corporate entities and then support the agenda of big polluters in return for money.
When determining how much money a person will need to borrow in loans for each year of higher education, the person need to take into account future value and the interest rates.
<h3>What is loan?</h3>
A loan is a financial transaction in which one or more individuals, organizations, or other entities lend money to other persons, organizations, or entities.
The recipient incurs a debt and is normally responsible for paying both interest and the principal amount borrowed until the obligation is repaid.
A person must take an account the future worth and interest rates when computing how much income you will be needed to borrow for every year of your higher education.
Therefore, borrower must take into account the future value and interest rates.
Learn more about the future value, refer to:
brainly.com/question/14860893
#SPJ1
In a study by Briol and Petty, participants were exposed to strong or weak arguments on a topic while either shaking their heads or nodding their heads. A person would be more persuaded if they were shaking their head while listening to a flimsy argument.
Not all fallacious are inherently weak arguments. Because it is unfounded, an argument may be poor. Solving a mathematical equation is a classic example; if you made a mistake in the proof, it would not be regarded as "weak argument," just invalid. Because you only need to check for logical mistakes throughout the deductive process, invalid arguments are frequently simpler to identify.
A weak argument can't be flawed if it is based on untrue premises. For instance, "Video game playing encourages violent behaviour. This person spends a lot of time playing video games, so violence is probably in their future. The weak argument that playing video games is associated with violence is false, thus even though the argument is compelling, it is still flawed.
Learn more about weak argument here
brainly.com/question/13576121
#SPJ4
