Answer:
The full payment is due within a 30-day credit period.
The buyer can deduct 2% of the invoice amount if payment is made within 10 days of the invoice date.
Explanation:
The credit terms of 2/10,n/30 means that
The credit period available is 30 days in which the fully payment is due
And, if the payment is made within the 10 days so the buyer could eligible for 2% discount on the total price
Therefore the above 2 options should be considered
Answer:
D. Lessor is not obligated to compensate the lessee for the excess.
Explanation:
A lease agreement is a contract that allows for the use of an asset but does not convey ownership rights of the asset. It is a contract that exist between a lessor and a lessee that allows the lessee rights to the use of a property owned or managed by the lessor for a period of time.
If the residual value of a leased asset turns out to be more than the amount guaranteed by the lessee, the: Lessor is not obligated to compensate the lessee for the excess. because the lessee is responsible for the condition of the property during the lease period.
Answer:
Which non-cash expense is added back to the net profit in the indirect method of preparing a cash flow statement? DEPRECIATION
The indirect method of preparing a cash flow statement adds a non-cash expense, such as DEPRECIATION and or AMORTIZATION, to the net profit.
Explanation:
Cash flow statement is a statement of account or financial statement prepared by firms or organisations that shows how money comes or flow into a company. It also shows the amount of money that a company receives from sales of their goods and services.
Cash flow statement also shows us the money invested my the company in outside ventures which is used for generating revenues for the company.
There are two methods of preparing Cash flow statements
a. Indirect method.
b. Direct method
The indirect method of preparing a cash flow statement involves stating the net income of the firm and then adding back non cash expenses such as Depreciation, Amortization back to the net profit. After which the determination of the actual inflow or outflow of cash from firm in carried out.
<span>c. common resources are rival in consumption.
In the tragedy of the commons, William Forster Lloyd presented the example of a common resource being over used and destroyed because for any individual abusing the resource, they gained a benefit while the damage to the resource was paid by everyone.
So let's look at the available options and see what makes sense, or doesn't make sense.
a. people consider the value of resources in the future more than in the present.
* If this were true, the there wouldn't be a tragedy of the commons. So this is an incorrect answer.
b. markets do not account for the presence of property rights.
* The tragedy of the commons doesn't involve property rights. EVERYONE in the community is allowed to use the commons. The problem is irresponsible overuse of the common resource. So this is also an incorrect answer.
c. common resources are rival in consumption.
* This is the correct answer. The concept of Rivalry is where a common resource can not be simultaneous consumed by multiple users, or if the consumption of a resource decreases its utility to another consumer. In the tragedy, if one person grazes (consumes) more than their fair share, the commons gets over grazed and over time stops producing. Each person who's overgrazing does get a tangible short term benefit for doing so, but everyone has to pay the cost.
d. government does not efficiently allocate society's scarce resources.
* This is also a wrong answer. It's true that the commons could be regulated by the government, but then it would no longer be the commons.</span>
False that just don’t make since lol
