42
this is because half of 84 is 42
but if youre estimating it could also be 40
please mark as brainliest if i helped :)
Answer:
third answer
Step-by-step explanation:
The end behavior of the function indicates that the leading coefficient of x is negative (as x approaches infinity, f(x) approaches negative infinity for cubic functions with negative leading coefficients). This eliminates the first 2 answers. Next, factor out the common factor from the 3rd answer and set it to 0 to see if the roots of the polynomial shown on the graph (x=-3, x=2) match that of the answer.
- factor out -2x since each term in the 3rd answer is divisible by -2x => -2x(x^2+x-6)
- set the factored polynomial equal to 0 => -2x(x^2+x-6)
- divide both sides by -2x => 0 = x^2+x-6
- factor => (x+3)(x-2) = 0
- find zeros by setting both factors equal to 0 => x=-3, x=2
This means that the 3rd answer is correct. The last answer, while having the correct leading coefficient, will produce roots of 3 and -2 instead of -3 and 2, which is shown on the graph.
Answer:
2x+5
Step-by-step explanation:
Formula for the perimeter of a reactangle= 2(l+b)
So,
2(l+b) = 10x+18
2(3x+4 + b) = 10x+18
Rearrange and solve
3x+4+b = 5x+9
b = 5x+9 - 3x - 4
b = 2x+5
Thus the measurement of the width = 2x+5
Hope this helps
I believe its D hope this helps
Answer:
I KNOW SAMEEEEEEE IM SORRY XXX
Step-by-step explanation:
