What is Katz argument: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
What is the Katz v United States holding: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
The police may conduct a search incident to arrest after any constitutional arrest.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
There are majorly six exceptions to the warrant requirements. The first one is the search incident to lawful arrest. The police can conduct a search incident after a lawful arrest has been made.
For this the police does not require the issuance of any warrant. The police can search the person and the area that is surrounding the person or the area which is within the wingspan of the person whose arrest is to be made by the police.
Answer:
The doctrine of identification was a principle used in old English law which stated that a person who gets injured while traveling due to another's negligence cannot claim damages if the driver of the conveyance is contributorily negligent.
Explanation:
i read about it
Answer:
Redeemers
Bourbons
Explanation:
The Southern branch of the Party Establishment was the Redeemers. They were seeking to reclaim their political influence and to implement white nationalism.
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) (Rule 26)
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is a requirement for the expert witness. If the expert fails to include this, then there is a high chance that the testimony can be thrown out.
I hope this helps! :)