1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aleksklad [387]
3 years ago
10

Scientific racism according to rattansi 2007

Law
1 answer:
Andrew [12]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Una crítica epistemológica a la idea neopositivista de ‘racionalidad científica' a partir de un análisis del racismo implícito en los conceptos científicos ortodoxos sobre la diversidad biológica humana durante el periodo de aceptación de las tesis darwinistas sobre el origen evolutivo de nuestra especie.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
If you think anything from your vehicle check could affect your safety or ability to control your car, you should _____.
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Statistics show that many crimes have been declining over the last decade. Why do you think we are seeing a decline in crime? Do
Bond [772]

Answer:

- After decades of soaring levels of homicides and drug violence, the country's crime rate plunged dramatically over the last 25 years. ... In the early 1990s, U.S. crime rates had been on a steep upward climb since the Lyndon B. ... Did they see similar declines when they liberalized their abortion laws?

Explanation:

Then crime rates went down. And then they kept going down.

By decade’s end, the homicide rate plunged 42 percent nationwide. Violent crime decreased by one-third. What turned into a precipitous decline started later in some areas and took longer in others. But it happened everywhere: in each region of the country, in cities large and small, in rural and urban areas alike. In the Northeast, which reaped the largest benefits, the homicide rate was halved. Murders plummeted by 75 percent in New York City alone as the city entered the new millennium.

The trend kept ticking downward from there, more slowly and with some fluctuations, to the present day. By virtually any metric, Americans now live in one of the least violent times in the nation’s history.

MORE IN THIS SERIES

A&Q

Questioning popular answers to pressing conundrums

What Can the U.S. Do About Mass Incarceration?

CLARE FORAN

How Can the U.S. End Homelessness?

ALANA SEMUELS

SPONSOR CONTENT

The dangerous world of insurance inspection

ALLSTATE

What Should the World Do With Its Nuclear Weapons?

5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELPPP , IM SO LOST THE QUESTIONS ARE ABOVE . ANYTHING HELPS
Vikki [24]
Just look it up and write it out

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pros and cons of restorative justice?
AlekseyPX

Answer:

Explanation:

Pros:

Repair: Rather than simply dealing with crime in a clinical way, restorative justice acknowledges that it causes real harm to real people and real communities, helping everyone involved better understand a holistic view of the effects of crime.

Encounter: By bringing the victim and offender together in a safe way, the offender is given the chance to make amends rather than only deal with the legal consequences of their actions.

Transformation: The restorative process is designed to help bring about transformation in both parties. Some studies have indicated that restorative justice methods are more effective in improving victim-offender satisfaction, increasing the likelihood that the offender will comply with consequences or restitution, and decreasing the chance that offenders will reoffend in the future.

Cons:

In the case of a violent crime in which the victim and offender knew each other before the incident took place, the victim may want no further contact with the offender. In cases in which violence became a pattern, such as in a domestic abuse situation, attempts at preserving a toxic victim-offender relationship may be much more dangerous than potentially helpful.

Restorative justice also assumes that the offender is remorseful and willing to make amends, which may not always be true. In the case of in-person meetings, even if they’re monitored, there’s always the possibility that communications will deteriorate and cause the victim additional emotional or mental trauma.

On the other hand, even if the offender is remorseful, there’s no guarantee that the victim will be open to receiving an apology. Things may take a very different turn, and the victim or victims may interrogate the offender in a way that doesn’t turn out to be beneficial.

In instances of minor crimes, sometimes attempts at restorative justice may lead to a criminal receiving a lighter sentence or avoiding a criminal record altogether. Whether or not this is just can vary on a case-to-case basis.

6 0
3 years ago
Who is the URC maitaind by
sdas [7]

Answer:

Endeavor Group Holdings

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • W. No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,
    5·1 answer
  • As long as the jury is made up of persons representing a cross-section of the community in which the trial takes place, it is re
    7·2 answers
  • How were nixon and clintons situations similar and different
    12·2 answers
  • How did this item help law enforcement connect James Perry to the murders of Mildred and Trevor Horn?
    6·1 answer
  • Qasffffffffsafaasfsfsfsf
    8·2 answers
  • According to the video, Municipal Clerks issue permits and licenses for what things? Check all that apply.
    15·2 answers
  • Question
    11·1 answer
  • Facts about feminism in the 1960s and 70s in America
    13·1 answer
  • 3
    9·1 answer
  • Are the methods we use to deal with stressful situation​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!