Answer:
C. whether the audience thinks information is being shared in an appropriate way
Explanation:
A persuasive message is a type of message that seeks, to sways, informs, convinces, or calls to action of the message recipient(s). Persuasive messages are often modeled in terms of reason versus emotion.
Hence, whether a one- or two-sided message is more persuasive will depends on all of the following:
1. whether the audience already agrees with the message: the moment audience or recipients agrees with the message, that means the message is persuasive.
2. whether the audience is unaware of opposing arguments: often times, the momement, the audience find a message persuasive, they are not aware of the opposing argument, thus believe the message being passed to them is the final.
3. whether the audience is unlikely later to consider the opposition: this implies that, when the audience is unlikely to consider the message of the opposition, the message being passed to them has persuaded them fully.
However, whether the audience thinks information is being shared in an appropriate way is not enough to ascertain that, the message whether one sided or two sided is persuasive.
Answer:
Trade compliance professionals should be connected to these changes within their organizations to help ensure that the new reality does not result in inadvertent compliance issues, violations, or penalties—as well as operational costs to unwind noncompliant activities—in the future. No organization wants to redesign their business activities and incur significant transaction costs and disruption only to find out later that their redesign is in violation of export control, customs, sanctions, or other trade laws. As the situation continues to develop, global trade compliance professionals should be monitoring these issues at their organizations to ensure that they, and their compliance programs, are part of the evolving conversation and that key stakeholders are making decisions with the benefit of input from trade compliance.
Explanation:
Answer:
He is using the methods of the foot-in-the-door phenomenon
Explanation:
The Foot-in-the-door technique is a gentle tactic that one uses to get a person to agree to a large request by first having them agree to a modest request first. That is the technique Joe Banks is employing
Answer:
During the Gupta period, architecture became more complex, great paintings and sculptures were created, and new ideas in math and medicine were developed is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
reactive
Explanation:
Societies who made reactive change only make it in order to adapt Rather than do it for a certain cause or principles.
In the example above, BP's already know that their method of over exploitation could possess a risk for oil spilling, and yet they did not make the necessary effort to prevent it.
After the explosion occurred and the spilled oil damaged the nearby environment, BP decided to make a change by containing surface oil and Utilizing chemical oil dispersal to separate the oil that is spilled underwater.
BP made the change in reaction after the accident occured, not before. Which is why we consider this as a reactive change.
