According to brutus, A confederation of small republics is more likely to preserve and protect personal liberties, because as the people are the sovereign, and their sentiments are communicated by themselves which is why it must be limited so that the people can conveniently assemble and debate.
- The large republics could cancel out the voices of the people and states and the authority of the states, because they are bigger in size and could gain more power and could infringe on state sovereignty, which would infringe on the peoples' liberties
Brutus favors a true confederation, which would be: a number of independent states entering , for conducting certain general concerns, in which they have a common interest, leaving the management of their internal and local affairs to go and their separate governments.
to know more about republic click here
brainly.com/question/15340060
#SPJ4
When we say we make an appeal to convince the audience we are making a request to the public, a serious, crucial or honest one. In this case, to move the audience (the parents) to support our case (go to school later would be easier for them), we have to talk about something that can benefit them from this change, if not they wouldn’t be interested. For example, saying that because is late it isn’t dangerous walking to school, and they wouldn’t have to drive you. In that case, they won’t even have to move from the house and have their own timetable.
It is Robert Merton. Merton's hypothesis of aberrance comes from his 1938 investigation of the connection between culture, structure, and anomie. Merton characterizes culture as a "sorted out arrangement of regularizing esteems overseeing conduct which is basic to individuals from an assigned society or gathering".
The answer is (B.) most farmers from the west supported Jackson
