Answer: No, Paul has not breached a contract.
Explanation: To answer this, we must first we must define what a contract is.
A contract is an agreement between two or more people that is legally binding, and which guides or governs the actions or conducts of the parties involved.
A quality that makes a contract legally binding is that it is enforceable by law.
In the scenario given in the question above, Paul has not breached any contract because there isn't one. The promise to buy dinner has not been legally bound, therefore, it is not enforceable by law, in essence, it is not qualified to be called a contract.
Answer:
Trade Surplus and positive net Capital flow
Explanation
Take a small quiz of each subject and have someone grade it and then you will know the answer to your question
Answer:
the question is false
Explanation:
you can't sell stock for ownership
In the given scenario, Rembrandt Cosmetics accomplished its substitution primarily through strategic planning of equivalence.
<h3>What is strategic planning?</h3>
When the differences between two different strategic plans are identical, with other things being constant, such a situation is called as a strategic planning of equivalence.
Hence, strategic planning holds true regarding the given situation.
Learn more about strategic planning here:
brainly.com/question/16699515
#SPJ1