Answer1:an international agreement, usually regarding routine administrative matters not warranting a formal treaty, made by the executive branch of the US government without ratification by the Senate Answer2: An executive agreement is an agreement between the heads of government of two or more nations that has not been ratified by the legislature as treaties are ratified. Executive agreements are considered politically binding to distinguish them from treaties which are legally binding
Employees who have worked for more than 180 days must submit a reemployment application within 90 days.
<h3>What is reemployment?</h3>
Reemployment is Re-employment is the reappointment of an employee who had a permanent appointment with the City at the time of their layoff from a layoff re-employment list. Company can hire the employ which can be left before.
Thus, Employees who have worked for more than 180 days
For more details about Reemployment, click here:
brainly.com/question/14307282
#SPJ1
Answer:
O The Supreme Court's role as the
highest court in the land
Explanation:
Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it.
Lobbyist and Interest groups basically influence legislatures to
pass their wanted laws/amendments. lobbyists are hired usually by a businessman/corporation. Interest groups do the same thing but are more for the people. citizens may join them and help advocate for things. Lobbying is protected by the first amendment.
Answer:
Corporations were not initially held criminally responsible for corporate activities. A corporation is considered to be a legally fictitious entity, incapable of forming the means rea necessary to commit a criminal act. Initially, corporations have not been accused of corporate responsibility. A corporation is classified as legally fictional, unable to provide the means for committing a crime. In 1909, the Supreme Court rejected this proposal. A corporate who is held criminally liable for it’s employees criminal conduct may suffer financially and criminally. A corporation can be held liable for the criminal acts of it’s employees as long as the employees are acting within the scope of employment and their conduct benefits the corporation. A corporation cannot be imprisoned or punished like individuals.
Explanation:
I'm not sure if this helps but it is the best i can do
