You are right. Another word for his advisers is his cabinet
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Belva is cheated when she buys a car from Fast Eddie’s Car Mart. She attempts to return the car, but Eddie just laughs and tells her to go away. Every time Belva has to make a repair on the car, she gets angry. Finally, she decides to wreck Eddie’s car to get even with him. Following him home from work one evening, Belva tries to ram his car, hoping to bend the axle or frame. Instead of bending the frame, the collision smashes Eddie’s gas tank, causes an explosion, and kills him.
Is Belva guilty of any degree of homicide?
Answer:
Belva is guilty of first-degree murder.
Explanation:
As we can see in the question above, Belva planned to crash Eddie's car. She premeditated this attack even though she knew it would be dangerous and that it would compromise her and his life. This causes Belva to be indicted for first-degree murder.
This is because, first-degree homicide is one in which the individual plans to attack the other and that attack results in death.
Belva planned to attack Eddie, for this reason, Belva is guilty of first-degree murder.
I believe the answer would be: b. both can establish a military/paramilitary organization
Answer:
"Evidence that is formally presented before the trier of fact (i.e., the judge or jury) to consider in deciding the case. The trial court judge determines whether or not the evidence may be proffered. To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay). Also termed competent evidence; proper evidence; legal evidence."
Explanation:
Answer:
D. Adult Judge
Explanation:
A survey conducted by the American Youth Policy Forum(AYPF) in 2004 revealed that Youth courts used an estimate of;
1. 40% of the adult judge model
2. 26% of the peer jury model
2. 17% of the youth judge model
3. 9% of a combination of models
4. 8% of the youth tribunal
We can thus infer that most teen courts use the adult judge as the decision maker.
When juveniles commit offences their cases can be held in a court presided over by peers who are in the same age bracket with them. A youth judge presides over the case most times. A panel or jury made up of other youth judges sometimes numbering up to six deliberate over the matter and make a decision that would be announced to the court. Restorative justice is applied most of the time.
The sentencing administered by the teen court might include sending the offender to a rehabilitation center so that the main factor that caused his or her misbehavior can be corrected.
