Answer: a.House Ways and Means Committee
Explanation:
A house ways and means committee is an government organization that has a task of reviewing and recommending the government under power about financial budgets. This committee finds the ways to raise the revenue.
The revenue will be used to meet the national expenditure requirements and it also contribute to the implementation of economic goals and policies. This committee is a legislative organization for imposing the federal tax in the England.
Answer:
Rodney should win the case because he showed up to do the work but Yolanda failed to perform her part of the contract (provide the paint).
The legal term used to describe Rodney's offer of performance is tender or attempted performance. In this case, Rodney (the promisor) went to Yolanda's house and offered to perform his painting services. Yolanda (the promisee) did not perform her part of the contract by not providing the paint, so the promisor was unable to perform. Since Rodney's non-performance was directly caused by Yolanda's non-performance, he is not liable for anything since Yolanda lost her rights because she breached the contract first.
Answer:This is what I know
Explanation:
Laws are never respected nor unforced in India. Indians follow all rules and laws when they are in a foreign country in the Western world. However, when they are in India, they usually don’t follow Indian laws. There are several reasons for Indians are not following the rules in India like
1: Lenient Laws-The Indian laws are extremely lenient and flexible. Often the penalty for violating the law is so low that it would be profitable to break the law.
2:Poor enforcement-The enforcement of law is quite poor due to shortage of government officials, corruption and slow justice delivery system. Even when a case is booked against the offender, it takes several years for the culprit to bring to justice.
3: Wrong role model-The leaders and top officials in India are often the first people to break the law. They even take pride of doing so. That set a wrong example before the common people in India who follow their footsteps.
12. The least common pieces of PPE worn by forensic lab personnel are lab coats, safety glasses, and protective gloves.
The most common pieces of PPE worn by forensic lab personnel are lab coats, safety glasses, and protective gloves.
13. To maintain the integrity of evidence for use in court, there should be no more than two unexplained or undocumented openings to the evidence package.
To maintain the integrity of evidence for use in court, there should be no unexplained or undocumented openings in the evidence package.
14. Proper lab practices are important to make sure the analysis results are reliable, inaccurate, and estimated.
Proper lab practices are important to make sure the analysis results are reliable and accurate.
15. Before the evidence is even opened, the analyst must make sure there are witnesses.
When evidence is opened, there must be proper documentation to prove it.
This statement is FALSE. Everyone has their own opinion on whether or not to stand for the flag and it may even contradict your own. This does not mean we need to discriminate against them. Not everyone who does not stand for the flag is a democrat, making this statement proves you are someone who is simple minded and not educated.
