Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer: A well-written report can prove more efficient in a court of law, speaking more logically and correctly to lawyers and judges. Possible avoidance of court: A report that leaves little material for questioning could help an officer avoid having to attend court at all.
Explanation: A police report must include four basic characteristics to be useful and understandable by those using the report. These include: accuracy, completeness, conciseness and clarity.
Answer:
Was it breached if the neighbor sells it to someone else for $100 more?
