Answer:
vavsgxhhdhdhdhddhdghhhh happy with the best inference you send it to me and my sister and I will be fail compilation video normal to me as I am sending like it be ok for the best way is fine but my husband has started to you and your family and your team to help with that why do we need the sallbus of social work and your team and your family and your copy ko lekar ek kavita hai to me and I am watching the playlist to help with that said I am sending my CV for your copy ko
Answer:
I agree with the statement "In order to have good friends, you have to be a good friend", because if I want respect and kindness from someone, I assume that person would want respect and kindness from me. You have to treat people, how you would want to be treated, so if you want to have a good friend, you need to expect that they want the same. Being good towards others, and giving them respect, makes other people respect you, and be kind towards you. This saying reminds of another quote "Don't give an inch and expect a mile."
I think that this is a very hard question to answer. I think that many kings, fictional or not, possess both the bad and good traits of being a king.
In regards to Macbeth, he certainly possessed the ambition many would wish for a king. He was brave, as noted by Duncan and the title of the Thane of Cawdor. He was protective, as noted by his murder of Banquo. Macbeth was even proud, as seen by his desire to keep the new title of Thane before taking the crown.
Unfortunately, many of the characteristics one would align with being a good king made Macbeth a bad king as well. Macbeth was too ambitious--as seen by his murdering Duncan. He was too protective--as seen by his inability to interpret the apparitions warnings in the correct way. Lastly, he was too proud--as seen by his refusal to leave the castle as Birnam Wood "moved" against him.
Like anything, one must always have control. Too much of anything normally turns out to be a bad thing. Therefore, depending upon one's individual views, Macbeth could be both a bad king or a good one.
BTW: It's free real estate.
Some people are saying it's C-Deeply personal. Although, to be honest, ALL literature is A because it depends on how you interpret it. That's why we have literature classes and 10 people can write 10 different opinions on what the literature is saying. Since contemporary simply means the writing written after WWII era, it can range so much, that saying it's deeply personal, in my opinion, is too broad. So I would say A, unless you have something in your reading/lessons that say otherwise, or gives a specific answer.
