Answer:
The two triangles are related by Side-Side-Side (SSS), so the triangles can be proven congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
There are no angles that can be shown to be congruent to one another, so this eliminates all answer choices with angles (SSA, SAS, ASA, AAA, AAS).
This leaves you with either the HL (Hypotenuse-Leg) Theorem or SSS (Side-Side-Side) Theorem. We could claim that the triangles can be proven congruent by HL, however, we aren't exactly sure as to whether or not the triangles have a right angle. There is no indicator, and in this case, we cannot assume so.
This leaves you with the SSS Theorem.
Answer:
Third option
Step-by-step explanation:
The first definition is not as broad as it should be, therefore, while an angle does meet that criteria, it's not a general definition, hence, it is incorrect. The second one is incorrect as well because a parabola has a vertex, and it is certainly not an angle. This definition is not specific enough, so it will be eliminated. The last one is again, too specific. The third one is the best answer because it is broad enough while still being specific.
Area of rectangle = length x width
this is the formula to find it.
now , put the values of length and width,
=> area= 12 x 3 x 6 x 2
=> area = 432 feet^2
#7 is VTU AND HFG
#8 is AAS
Answer:127 pages of paper
Step-by-step explanation:
18 times 7
