Answer: The correct answer is objectively explain the story in your own words.
Explanation: The second step is telling what happens rephrasing it straightforwardly.
The following sentence uses a straw man argument: "Those who are critical of self-driving cars need to learn to accept technological advances and stop resisting the future."
A straw man argument is when you give the impression that you are countering an opponent's point, when in reality you are "making up" a point that your opponent has not presented. It is like beating down a straw man or a dummy instead of a real adversary.
Here, people who are suspicious about self-driving cars are immediately described by the author as opposed to "technological advances" and "resisting the future." However, few people who have expressed doubts about self-driving cars would say that they are against scientific progress in general. Rather, they are concerned about the safety and the accuracy of the artifical intelligence, for example, but that does not mean that they are opposed to the idea. The author uses this rhetorical device to make his/her opponents lose credibility.
Chaucer was captured in the year 1360 while fighting in the Hundred Years' War.
Brutus promises he's not suspicious of Cassius' motives or flattery but asks him to lay off trying to get him to kill Caesar for a little bit.
The author uses specific diction such as "deep impact" when referring to Mendel's work and "very little understanding" when talking about Mendel's scientific peers, as shown in option C.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Diction refers to the use of specific words to express the thoughts or information that the author wants to express to the reader.
- In “The Journey to Acceptance” the author uses diction to express his position on the research by Mendel and Mendel’s scientific peers.
- In this case, he uses the words “profound impact” to demonstrate how Mendel's research was important to the scientific community, showing a favorable bias to this research.
- However, the author uses the diction “very small understanding” to refer to Mendel's scientific peers, showing that this element was of little importance for the scientific field and positioning a negative bias.
In this case, we can reinforce how important diction is for the establishment of a well-structured text.
More information:
brainly.com/question/23480929?referrer=searchResults
