Answer:
D. If different types of leaves are exposed to low temperatures, then they will change colors.
Explanation:
This is true but in a hypothesis, it doesn't matter what is true or not, but this sentence totally says that that is true. IT IS SAYING IT BOLDLY. That is why I think this sentence is the most proper hypothesis here.
But, don't think that I only THINK that option is true, it is actually true.
Thanks, please mark me Brainliest!
Have a great day Studying!
1884 – Mary Agnes Snively, the first Ontario nurse trained according to the principles of Florence Nightingale, assumes the position of Lady Superintendent of the Toronto General Hospital's School of Nursing.
Answer:
The four most common systems of Greek government were:
Democracy - rule by the people (male citizens).
Monarchy - rule by an individual who had inherited his role.
Oligarchy - rule by a select group of individuals.
Tyranny - rule by an individual who had seized power by unconstitutional means.
Explanation:
Many economies from Europe and other areas like Japan which were very powerful during the 1800s and 1900s. As a consequence of this, these nations were competing to extend and dominate other regions around the world. Imperialism was growing very rapidly at that time.
Europeans nations in particular, were adding new colonies from Africa and Asia to the ones they already had established in the exploration age. Japan and the United States, were also contemplating the benefits of imperialism.
All these powerful countries could now get all kinds of products and raw materials from the new acquired colonies, and that is why they were called extraction economies.
Contrary to these nations, the United States did not have a shortage of raw material, so it was not that important to them. In fact, the U.S. was producing a grater amount of goods than they could consume. There was not any need to get colonies for the sole purpose of extract their products and raw materials.
Numerous originalists would reply "yes," on the grounds that legal audit isn't listed as an energy of the Judicial Branch in the Constitution.
Then again, the legal audit was at that point a setup training when the Constitution was composed, and the Framers, a significant number of whom were attorneys with information of court method, didn't expressly disallow it. Article III makes no say of how the Judicial Branch should practice statute. The absence of direction has a tendency to infer the Framers deliberately permitted adaptability and a level of independence in deciding the courts' operation. In the event that they had no aim for the Judicial Branch to go about as a mind the energy of the other two branches, they could have set more unequivocal rules for the legal to take after.
