The correct answer is B
evidence
persuasive arguments must provide evidence and facts to back up its arguments as people tend to believe in facts delivered with evidence. This can take the form of statistics and other forms of scientific facts back up methods.
Answer:
Nathan is a public official whose salaried duties include real estate transactions.
Explanation:
In the situation shown in the question above, we can conclude that Nathan is a civil servant whose salaried duties include real estate transactions, for this reason, he is not violating any license law, even though he does not have a real estate license in DC.
A civil servant is a person who provides a service of social utility, that is, who gives support to others without ulterior motives or for their personal benefit (he has nothing to gain but the salary he earns for his work). Public servants, as a general rule, provide services on behalf of the State. It is the responsibility of state institutions (such as hospitals, schools or security forces) to bring public service to the entire community.
<span>You would use existing case law to attempt to prove the existence or nonexistent of contractual intent. Some major cases that a person could draw supporting evidence are:
Lumbreras v Rocha
2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 97 (13th Dist. 2012)
All Star Championship Racing, Inc. v. O'reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34951 (C.D. Ill. 2012)</span>
Answer: prosecutorial waiver
Explanation:
Its the answer
<span>Although enthusiasm for helping victims is clearly growing, <u>the willingness to pay for the necessary services is NOT always present.
</u><u />People always like to help other people in need whenever they can, but when it comes to paying for something they need and for their expenses, the willingness to do so somehow seems to disappear. Naturally, not many people like to spend money of people they don't even know, be they victims or not.<u>
</u></span>
