Answer:
There is not error for this one mate... So it would be "A".
Explanation:
If a person is speaking you will add the " on the beginning and the ending of what they are saying. Also if the character will show something or add something to their phrase that contributes with their phrase you will put the : . Every time putting a comma you will make a small breath stop, so read the sentence and see where you comfortably needed to make a breath pause.
| Have a great day !!!!! |
Answer:
The word has been elevated from the status of slang to colloquialism.
(Hope this helps! Btw, I answered first. Brainliest please! :D)
The quotation from the source that provides the best information to address the given research question is as follows:
- Here on Earth, particulate matter is a form of air pollution generated by forest fires, volcanic eruptions, and burning fossil fuels.
Thus, the correct option is C.
<h3>What is a Quotation?</h3>
A quotation may be defined as retribution or expression which is directly or indirectly carried from a book, poem, or play, which is recited by someone else.
The context of this question illustrates the differences in environmental factors of the moon and the earth distinctly.
It also expresses that Earth's surface consists of particulate matter which is a form of air pollution and is generated or provoked by the activities like forest fires, volcanic eruptions, and combustion of fossil fuels.
All such activities of inducing air pollution are significantly not seen on the surface of the moon.
Therefore, it is well described above.
To learn more about Air pollution on the earth, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/9420026
#SPJ1
Answer: It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Explanation:
The case of Ingraham v. Wright was heard in 1976 in the Supreme court based on an event that happened in 1970 where James Ingraham was paddled by the principal of a public high school in Florida to the point of needing medical assistance.
The district court the case was first heard in dismissed it and the Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal.
The Supreme court then agreed with the District court in saying that corporal punishment did not infringe upon Constitutional rights so the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
