All categories

3 years ago

Ture or false federalists were those who did not support the constitution

2 answers:

5 0

The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that theConstitution as it stood only limited the government not the people. The Anti- Federalistsclaimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression. (Googled it so it's not my work)

Otrada [13]3 years ago

3 0

True they followed the constitution.

You might be interested in

Which of the following did the five reformers who organized the Seneca Falls Convention have in common?

Oksana_A [137]

the five reformers who organized the Seneca falls had in common is: They were active in the abolition movement. In the Seneca falls convention, the members of many activist organization gathered to discuss the future of women's social condition. They see slavery as a similar form of oppression and had the same opinion towards abolishing it

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the absolute location of Illinois?

Nadya [2.5K]

Answer:

diaialf

Explanation:

when i take Drugs i go to the moon

3 0

3 years ago

1. What were the economic roles of serfs, nobles, clergy, merchants, monarchs, knights, artisans?

inn [45]

Answer:

Explanation:

1.What were the economic roles of serfs, nobles, clergy, merchants, monarchs, knights, artisans?

Serfs -- they belonged to the lowest social class of the feudal society. They weren't slaves, as they had a property to stay at.

They worked for the noble vassals. In a return, they got a place to stay, in the estate that belonged to the vassal. For that benefit, they worked very hard so they could repay their debt. When it came to power over politics and control of the property, they had none. If a noble vassal decided to sell his property, serfs would be sold, too.

Nobles -- belonged to the highest social class in the feudal system. They got their lands from the monarch, in return, they had to provide certain favors and services for him. Usually services that have something to do with military. This type of class was a hereditary class, and it carried certain financial and other benefits within.

Clergy -- it's a class of religious people. Priests, pastors, bishops, etc.carried this title. They had certain influence when it comes to making decisions on certain topics that were made by the politicians. When it comes to power, they didn't really have it, but they had influence on some spheres.

Merchants -- this title was carried by the people that used to set up businesses in towns and traded different things. Those goods weren't produced by them.

There are two types of merchants:

A wholesale merchant -- his role was to work between a producer and a retail merchant.

They organized the moving of the things that are made, but they don't move them.

A retail merchant -- is a person that sells certain things, to people who will consume them.

For example, a person that owns a place where certain goods are sold, he is a retail merchant.

Knights -- they used to serve for the lord. They were their company in the court and their role was to protect them. They were also armored and they rode on a horse. Not everybody could afford to be a knight as the equipment was very expensive. They also used to watch over the Lord's manor in order to make sure everything is doing well. The payment was in the form of land holdings. When it comes to Lords, they had big amounts of respect and trust towards knights.

Artisans -- people with certain skills and they made things with their own hands. The things they made were either for the everyday use or sometimes even only for the decoration.

Some of the goods they made: liquor, shoes, clothes, household items, tools, jewels etc.

2. What were the serfs, nobles, clergy’s, merchants, monarchs, knights, artisans place in the social hierarchy?

When it comes to social hierarchy, in the Middle Ages, it goes like this:

1. Pope/Church

2. Monarch

3. Nobles

4. Knights/ Vassals

5. Merchants / Craftsmen / Farmers

6. Peasants / Serfs

3. What were some challenges faced by serfs, nobles, clergy, merchants, monarchs, knights and artisans groups?

 4. What were the potential benefits of belonging to serfs, nobles, clergy, merchants, monarchs, knights, artisans groups?

1. Peasants and serfs belong to the lowest social status there were.

They used to work in the fields for many hours, but they also had time to have fun and do certain activities.

2. On a bit better position, there were merchants, farmers and craftsmen.

They were a bit more educated than the serfs and peasants, so they had a better life than them. They used to pass down to their offsprings everything they had learn. The last name they carried usually indicated what skills they had.

3. When it comes to Knights and vassals, they were sometimes members of the clergy. They carried many responsibilities with them and they served to any member that belonged to the clergy. Sometimes they would even maintain the manor where Lords used to lived, and they had to make sure that everything's going well in the manor.

4. Then, we have Nobles. They had a pretty high level of education.

When it comes to their wealth, they wouldn't make it by themselves, but they would inherit it from their ancestors. They used to believe that they had every right to secure their positions because of their families.

5. Then, on the top of the social pyramid, we have Monarchy.

They had the biggest power and authority and if a person wanted to be a part of this social class, they would have to be related by blood to the King.

* When it comes to disadvantages of being an artisan, it was the fact that they had no freedom. They used to be vassals of the person that used to own the part of the land where they worked. They didn't have permission to move from one village to another, without getting the permission from the person that was their Lord. And they would be overtaxed.

7 0

3 years ago

Both Marx and Hegel agreed that one of the following was inimical to building the ideal society. Which one of

kicyunya [14]

Answer:

The correct answer is C. Both Marx and Hegel agreed that competition was inimical to building the ideal society.

Explanation:

Marx and Hegel were the main ideological drivers of communism, beginning to develop this political theory in the 1800s. Both were based on the belief that a perfect society should be homogeneous, that is, without social classes or distinctions among its members. Therefore, they sought the rupture of the concept of social classes, thus achieving a single uniform and egalitarian class where all its members would have the same rights and obligations: the working class. In order to achieve its objective, it was necessary to break the competitive thinking of capitalism, to reach a criterion of collaboration and community, where the means of production and the applied workforce were a common good, and not an object that became in reason of fight between the members of society.

8 0

3 years ago

I have a suggestion can we please make frogs the new lgbtq+ mascot

butalik [34]

That frog is poisonous

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers