Describe the options available to circuit court judges once they have heard an appellate case.

2 answers:

4 0

Write In Your Own Words...
District courts have original jurisdiction over cases involving federal laws (including maritime, patent, and copyright law). That is, they serve as the venues in which jury trials are executed. US courts of appeals are forums in which decisions made in district courts may be appealed or considered again. This does not mean that another trial will occur at the appellate court. Circuit courts consider any possible mistakes or misinterpretations of the law made by the district court judges. In a sense, circuit courts merely serve as checks on the performance of district court judges.

Talja [164]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Circuit court judges generally have two options when reviewing a decision from the district courts. If they determine that some aspect of the trial was unfair or that procedures or legal precedents were incorrectly applied, the appellate court may send the case back for a retrial in the district courts. If the appellate court finds no mistakes were made by the district court judges, it may uphold the decision of the lower court.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Location and name of the native american that championed social movement

liraira [26]

Your answer is Etnias amerindias.

6 0

2 years ago

Which of these terms refers to a government controlling the economy in order to strengthen it?

Doss [256]

The answer is C or mercantilism.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help <br> I need any body solve the three questions

4vir4ik [10]

1.f 2.f 3t the main competition for Republican party was the know nothing party

3 0

3 years ago

Renaissance sculptures reflect humanism by -

Andrei [34K]

Answer: portraying religious leaders

Explanation: Renaissance artists would portray religious figures such as Jesus and Mary, but used backgrounds in Greece and Rome. They also painted well known people of the day that had individual achievements.

8 0

2 years ago

In 1992, presidential candidate H. Ross Perot said that signing the NAFTA agreement would produce a "giant sucking sound" in the

Natali [406]

Answer:

In 1992, presidential candidate H. Ross Perot said that signing the NAFTA agreement would produce a "giant sucking sound" in the United States. He meant that NAFTA would make jobs in the United States go to Mexico, where laboral costs were lower, thus producing unemployment and poverty in the United States. In view of the events, 17 years later we can affirm that the fears of H. Ross Perot were never confirmed.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers