Answer:
Three cases are considered: First case is to construct a small factory, second is to construct a large factory and third is to do nothing.
Construct a Small Facility is the most suitable option from the business perspective which makes case 1 recommended.
Explanation:
Case 1 - Construct a small facility
Return = [P(High Demand) x Revenue in case of High Demand] + [P(Low Demand) x Revenue in case of Low Demand] - Cost of Setup
= [ 0.4 x 12 ] + [ 0.6 x 10 ] - 6 = $ 4.8 million
Case 2 - Construct a Large Facility
Return = [P(High Demand) x Revenue in case of High Demand] + [P(Low Demand) x Revenue in case of Low Demand] - Cost of Setup
= [0.4 x 14] + [0.6 x 10] - 9 = $ 2.6 million
Case 3 - Do Nothing
Return = 0
I would live my life in the past because I would already know what would be happening in my life. I would be able to change the future for the better. If I were to live 1 year in the future the world can be completely different, and I wouldn't have a clue on how it changed.
When the value of technology utility and network externality benefits exceeds monopoly Costs.
Delirium and hallucinations caused by alcohol withdrawal.
Answer:
yes. at a $5 cost, he breaks even and is indifferent. he necessarily turns away business when the cost of the additional unit exceeds the income.
Explanation:
To maximize profits, a firm should continue selling until the marginal revenue product equals the marginal cost of the product. Marginal revenue product is the additional revenue from the sale of an extra cost. Marginal cost is the extra expense associated with the production of an additional unit.
Rodrigo should accept that extra business. His marginal revenue product from additional business equals the marginal cost. He will not make an accounting profit or loss but may gain a long term customer. He should decline any additional business only if the marginal cost is greater than the marginal revenue product.
