I guess the third one or the last one maybe?
Explanation:
Those sound the most right to me as an answer but I don't know for sure. If it's wrong don't blame me :)
Answer: Sid's brother can play tennis just as good as Sid.
Explanation: Because it is the same thing that the question is telling and the sentence structure is changed too.
Answer: Pythons are negatively affecting the local ecosystem.
Explanation:
Thousand of pythons are living in the Everglades, is just a fact.
Large rewards are being offered to capture and kill pythons, is also a statement. It's not a reason why pythons should be hunted, just a fact on what you'll get if you kill pythons. Of course... there is a reason why pythons should be hunted, but it is not stated here, so it's not the answer.
People who brought them here as pets created the problem. This isn't explaining the problem, just creating a scapegoat.
Answer:
“It did not lead him to meditate upon his frailty as a creature of temperature, and upon man's frailty in general, able only to live within certain narrow limits of heat and cold; and from there on it did not lead him to the conjectural field of immortality and man's place in the universe.”
Explanation:
According to a different source, this question refers to the story "To Build a Fire" by Jack London.
Part A asked what the student to choose a statement that best described the central theme of the story. The answer to this was: <em>"In the struggle of man against nature, nature always wins."</em>
Therefore, the quote that best supports the answer to Part A is: <em>"“It did not lead him to meditate upon his frailty as a creature of temperature, and upon man's frailty in general, able only to live within certain narrow limits of heat and cold; and from there on it did not lead him to the conjectural field of immortality and man's place in the universe.”</em>
In this story, we see that London explored the conflict man vs. nature. He argues that, in this fight, nature will always win as men are completely unprepared to survive in inhospitable environments. This is supported by this quote. In the quote, the author expresses his ideas on the condition of men. He argues that men are weak and frail, and can only survive under certain comfortable conditions. This demonstrates that men are extremely vulnerable when struggling against nature.
