Yes, if something has a positive side on something or someone it would be legal.
<span>e. b and c only
As long as a speaker lets the audience know who the author of a study is, and gives a brief overview of their credentials or qualifications, the audience should be able to trust the information that the speaker is presenting, based on their credible research.</span>
Writers and speakers use humor to convey truth by using humorous comparisons and examples related to the conveyed truth<span>. The truth is never simple and not everyone understands the complexity and the true meaning of it. With this constraint, writers, and speakers use a more understandable explanation. They use examples and comparisons for helping the people to understand.</span>
I have no I deal what this is about because I have never read the article but I'm leaning towards A , B or C and then out of those 3 just see which one matches the perspective more because I haven't read the article so I can't really say an answer...I'm sorry I tired at least but have a nice day or afternoon or night where ever you are
I could help you if i knew what the close reading was about
