Answer:
To be sure of the answer, you need to underline the part its talking about first lol
Explanation:
Answer:
He divorced mrs. Huffington due to finding out the affair between the pool cleaner Charles and her. He was staying at a hotel only two blocks from the crime scene. He was eager to leave town after. When he was interviewed he showed clear signs of anger towards mrs. Huffington.
Explanation:
This question is about the article "First Female Army Rangers Say They Thought of‘ Future Generations of Women "
Answer and Explanation:
Griest and Haver had the same experience as their male colleagues, in terms of training. They had to undergo heavy training, with great physical challenges that required strength, agility and initiative. Griest and Haver managed to overcome all these challenges, even with doubts about themselves and even if their male colleagues doubted that they would be able to finish the training. Although men underwent equal training, they learned to respect Griet and Haver's willpower and learned to understand that gender makes no difference to whoever is determined.
Answer:
They know an expert will provide the most accurate information.
Explanation:
They know an eyewitness will be free of personal bias. - This is not correct. Eyewitness reports of historical events will most likely be very much based on personal bias. Eyewitness reports will vary according to the cultural background of the person, where they were during events, their emotional state and stance towards the events, their background knowledge, their participation in the events, and many more.
They know a student who did research will be an accurate source. - This is not true. Historians can’t assume the student research will be the accurate source as students are only learning to do proper research and are expected to still make mistakes.
<u>They know an expert will provide the most accurate information. - This is the correct answer. When starting work, historians assume that experts who did research and examinations before them, and who put down information, are giving accurate accounts.</u> For example, if a historian’s work is based on the material artifact, he or she will assume that the archeologist before them made the best possible account into the explanation and background of the artifact.
They know an eyewitness report will always be truthful. - This is not true. As mentioned before, eyewitness reports are highly subjective, and therefore cannot be taken as true scientific findings.
Answer:
a 200 kg car is being pushed along a road with a force of 3000 Newtons and is receiving a frictional force of 300 Newtons. calculate the acceleration of the car
