In the senate all states are represented equally which favored the states.
In the house, the states are represented according to the proportion of the population of the state which favored the people.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Great compromise was an agreement which was signed between the small and the large states during the constitutional convention of the year of 1787. It defined the representation of the states in the constitution of the United States of America.
In the house, the states were represented according to the population of the people of the states which came to be in the favor of the people of the states. But in the senate, all the states had equal representation which came to be in the favor of the states.
Answer: Robert Clive was not a very nice man. He was a British colonel who while working for the British East India Company, took back the city of Calcutta which had been lost after the BEIC had lost it, and then bribed Mir Jafar, who was a military general who was later appointed Nawab of Bengal, to help get Bengal from Siraj. Clive really established the military and political supremacy of the East Idia company in Bengal-while making himself rich in the process.
Explanation:
Because he thought proper conduct stemmed from family<span>.</span>
Answer:
b. Southern states wanted to nullify tariffs.
Explanation:
The US-sanctioned customs tariff, which was approved by the US Congress and signed by Jackson in 1832, was less protectionist than another federal tariff approved in 1828, but nevertheless made many state residents discontented. In response to the approval of the tariff, a number of South Carolina citizens began to support the principles of states' rights of "nullification," which was enunciated by John C. Calhoun, Jackson's Deputy until 1832, in his Exposition and Protest of South Carolina in 1828. South Carolina dealt with the tariff by adopting the Order of Nullification, "which annulled both the customs tariffs approved by the federal government in 1828 and 1832 within the boundaries of the state.
Two of the most significant <span>impacts that the scramble for Africa left in Africa were 1) political instability and 2) ethnic tensions, since the invading Europeans had no regard for preexisting tribal boundaries. </span>
