Answer:
There are no options listed, but what I can tell you for sure is that John's actions were both unethical and illegal.
What John did is unethical because it is not moral and it goes against all the principles that guide professional conduct. John also did something illegal because he was an accomplice in committing fraud against the company. He knowingly benefited from the accountant's illegal actions, and that is basically the legal definition of an accomplice to a crime.
If they must pay for property's real estate taxes and premiums for insuring the building. The type of lease xyz company sign is:<u> Double net lease.</u>
<h3>What is Double net lease?</h3>
Double net lease can be defined as form of agreement that occur between a tenant and a landlord were the tenant agrees to pay for the cost of rent while the landlord on the other hand agrees to pay for operating expenses incurred by the tenant.
Based on the given scenario the type of the lease xyz company sign is called double net lease as they have to pay for property's real estate taxes as well premiums for insuring the building.
Therefore the type of lease xyz company sign is:<u> Double net lease.</u>
Learn more about double net lease here:brainly.com/question/14244511
#SPJ1
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The GAAP established that when the benefits of obtaining accounting information are lower than the costs of providing that information, the information should not be provided.
For example, sometimes there are very small differences in certain accounts that don't allow a balance sheet to be balanced. If the accounting error is very small, e.g. just a few hundred dollars, then it is not reasonable to have a whole audit team check all the financial statements again to determine what caused the error. An adjusting entry could be made to close the account balances.
Imagine you are an auditor that must check the physical inventory of a factory and some boxes containing supplies are misplaced. It might take you a whole day to count again all the supplies and materials, but is it worth it? If the supplies were really expensive, probably yes, but if they were cheap components, then probably no.
Answer:
$164,210 decrease
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what would be the amount of differential cost increase or decrease from making the part rather than purchasing it
Differential cost increase or decrease=(32,842 * 16)- (32,842 * 11)=
Differential cost increase or decrease=$525,472-$361,262
Differential cost increase or decrease=$164,210 decrease
Therefore what would be the amount of differential cost increase or decrease from making the part rather than purchasing it is $164,210 decrease
