Answer:a better understanding of potential research problems
Explanation:
Answer: I think the answer is C
Explanation:
Explanation:
Point-wise explanation is given below:
i) The anti-defection law was introduced to curb the growing trend of elected representatives who changed political parties to become ministers or to get cash rewards.
ii) The affidavit requirement was an order passed by the Supreme Court as a measure to curb the challenge of money and muscle power.
iii) The third reform measure was made by the Election Commission where for all political parties it was mandatory to hold regular elections and also file their income tax returns.
<u><em>Besides these, many suggestions are often made to reform political parties:</em></u>
iv) It should be made mandatory for political parties to give a minimum number of tickets, about one-third, to women candidates. Similarly, there should be a quota for women in the decision-making bodies of the party.
v) There should be state funding of elections. The government should give parties money to support their election expenses. This support could be given in kind: petrol, paper, telephone etc. Or it could be given in cash on the basis of the votes secured by the party in the last election.
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em>Hope the answer helps you!!</em>
<em>Happy Answering!!</em>
<em>Be Brainly!!</em>
<span>Framing focuses attention on certain
events and locates them within a field of significance. It has a big influence
on how individuals perceive or interpret the meaning attributed to events. This
is vital in successfully mobilizing people or influencing their perception. </span>
Answer:
C. national conventions for nominating presidential candidates
Explanation:
The progressives wanted the citizens to have as much influence as possible during the election of the president.
If presidential candidates were chosen by the national conventions, the political parties are the one that will decide which person can run as the presidential candidates. The citizens/voters have no say on it. This will increase the risk that the parties will only appoint nominees that serve the interest of the party, not the citizens.
This is why the progressives favor direct primaries, which enable the citizens to vote for the candidate that should run for the presidential election.