I do not know exactly what answer you are looking for here considering the fact that there are many differences between the actions of animals and humans. The best answer I would give is that people have a sense of what is wrong and right and decide based on a moral subconscious. Animals act on they need to survive and do not care about acting civilized or what is right and wrong.
"Does the BCBA have consent to share video of the research subjects in this capacity?" are some ethical considerations the bcba should keep in mind.
A person holding a certification in applied behaviour analysis is known as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). The Behavior Analyst Credential Board awards this certification to BCBAs. Applied behavioural analysis (ABA) employs methodical, scientific and ethical procedures to assist change a person's behaviour.
BCBA can work in educational settings such as classrooms, hospitals, clinics, and nonprofit organisations; many of them have areas of expertise such as autism, developmental impairments, or mental health problems. That is undoubtedly one application, but there are a tonne more.
ABA is used in human resources, education, and even mobile app development. Behavior analysts employ a variety of methods to assist in achieving desired results.
Know more about BCBA here
brainly.com/question/28284522
#SPJ4
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>b. the type of encoding task matches the type of retrieval task. </em><em> </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>Transfer-appropriate processing</em><em> is also denoted as 'TAP' and is defined as a kind of "state-dependent memory" that significantly shows that memory performance of an individual is not only being explained or represented by the depth-processing but through the relationship that exists between the process of encoded information initially and later on the retrieval process.</em>
<em>The correct answer for the given question is option b.</em>
<span>No, because the right to free speech allows for a reasonable regulation of time, place, and manner so long as the regulation is content neutral.
The right of free speech that Citizens in United States have extended until those citizens cause a certain amount of harm toward other citizens. If this happens, both other citizens and the Defense Department have the right to stop the speech..
</span>
Is there no Options??????