Answer:
The opportunity cost = $2.5
Explanation:
Given:
You own a building that has four possible uses: a cafe, a craft store, a hardware store, and a bookstore. The value of the building in each use is $2,000; $3,000; $4,000; and $5,000, respectively.You decide to open a hardware store.
<u>Question asked:</u>
The <u>opportunity cost of using this </u><u>building for a hardware store</u> ?
<u>Solution:</u>
As we know:
What you sacrifice = Value of a cafe + Value of a craft store + Value of a bookstore
= $2000 + $3000 + $5000 = $10,000
What you gain = Value of a hardware store
= $4000
Thus, the opportunity cost of using this building for a hardware store is $2.5
<u>Available Options Are:</u>
A. Create an owner-based sharing rule to grant access to account records that have the same segment to all sales manager roles.
B. Change the role hierarchy and put all of the sales managers in the US and Canada in the same role.
C. Create criteria-based sharing rules to grant access to account records that have the same segment to all sales manager roles.
D. Create a public group and include all accounts of the same segment and grant access through a permission set.
Answer:
Option A. Create an owner-based sharing rule to grant access to account records that have the same segment to all sales manager roles
Explanation:
This owner based sharing will allow the sales manager to access information but he will not be able to alter information which gives a right to access information only. This sharing of information will resolve the sales manager concern and will also him and other sales manager to use this information to make informed decisions. Hence Option A is correct.
Putting in the same role would manipulate the data because the data entered by each sales manager will not be distinguished easily and thus the system will not produce meaningful results. Hence Option B is also incorrect.
Option C is also incorrect because allowing access on meeting certain criteria would result in restriction of data. Thus it is not the solution.
Option D allowing access to all the data would not be necessary as some of the data might require protection and also that it might be meaningless to have private accounts. Thus the option D is incorrect.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following,
The human resource functions that are likely to be affected by this change are Resource Management, Personal Data Management, Training, and Performance Management.
Human Resource Management helps the organization carry out this change successfully, explaining how these modifications can benefit the employees and the entire organization. HR has to use the proper means of internal communication to explain in advance the kinds of oof changes that are coming. This will prevent fear and anxiety, and eliminate rumors about the situation of the employees in the organization.
HR has to be careful in confirming that nobody is going to be fired by the arrival of new technologies. Then, HR has to explain in detail the many benefits in planning, scheduling, organizing, inventory, and many other benefits for each department. If employees do not feel threatened by this new technology they would welcome changes that allow them to do their work more productively.
Answer:
B. Executives
Explanation:
Option E is wrong. Students do not need high-end briefcases for school or other tasks.
Option D is incorrect. Postal workers do not need any expensive briefcases to carry postal service and letters.
Option C is false. Construction workers cannot afford expensive briefcases.
Option A is not correct. Police officers have not necessary to have those briefcases.
Option B is correct. Executives often need high-end briefcases to keep essential things with them. They can also afford expensive bags.
Answer:
The correct option is "A"
Explanation:
The pre-dominant confirmations would incorporate;
-
The restriction by the investee to the speculator's impact confirm by the claims or protests to administrative specialists.
- An understanding is marked by the speculator to give up the noteworthy investor rights.
-
A gathering of investors have a larger part proprietorship, who exercise impact over the tasks of the investee regardless of the perspectives on the investor.
- A portrayal structure the investee's governing body can't be gotten by the financial specialist.
In the event that the speculator claims 30 percent of the democratic supplies of investee and other individual holds 70 percent of the democratic stocks, at that point it can't be said that the financial specialist (30 percent) has the capacity of essentially impact in investee.
