What caused the development of nativism in the 1920s? ... nativists thought this meant fewer immigrants should be let in the country. some people involved in postwar disputes were immigrant anarchists and socialists, who many americans believed were actually communists.
A Supreme Court ruling made the posting in each classroom in a public school of Ten Commandments as unconstitutional Stone V. Graham.
It was called unconstitutional because it does not have any religious purpose. The court argued that it is a part of the curriculum. Furthermore, it's against the Establishment Clause.
Answer: True
Explanation: Constantine was a Roman emperor who ruled from 306 to 337. Constantine got into to the throne as Emperor of Rome after the death of his father and due to the loyalty of his troops. At the beginning of his government, the empire was a tetrarchy (government of four rulers) until 313, in which Licinius (emperor of the east) and Constantine imposed themselves over the other emperors, establishing themselves as emperors of east and west respectively. In spite of the above, Constantine considered himself stronger than Licinius, so he decided to start a frontal attack of him that emerged victorious in 326, becoming the only emperor of the empire and taking all the eastern territories. There he founded a city with his name, Constantinople in present-day Istanbul (Turkey). Therefore, the correct answer is True.
Answer:
1. The Treaty of Paris in 1763 caused that the French Empire lost its possessions in America. Spain took advantage of this and took possesion over it.
2. During the Spanish Domain, French-Speaker dwellers of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick in the actual Canada, refugeed in Lousiana after they were expelled by English invaders. This caused the population of Louisiana to grow and to be more multi-linguistic and multi-ethnic.
3. Between 1778-1783, colonists from the Canary Islands settled in Louisiana and also contributed to the demographic growth of Lousiana. This new colonists expanded the agricultural frontier and the variety of ethnical groups.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Rome became a democracy about the year 133 BC. Later, the Romans ruled the world. Even the voting mechanism was rigged to give the votes of the rich more weight. When Augustus, the first emperor, died in 14 AD, public elections had all but vanished. This was a revolution, brought about by a century of civil conflict and, at times, outright combat. The important turning point, according to many Romans, was in the year 133 BC. The sequence of events is rather obvious. In the process, he removed another tribune who was opposed to the distribution and claimed that his reforms should be paid for with money from the newly established Roman imperial province of Asia. The land measure proposed by Gracchus was approved. Gracchus' motive is a little more hazy. Whatever his motivations, his work crystallized many of the basic concerns that would underpin revolutionary politics for the following century. Rome's expanding empire had far-reaching implications. Tiberius' plan to utilize Asia's income for land distribution was a bold declaration, implying that both the affluent and the poor should benefit from Rome's conquests. However, Tiberius' decision to run for a second tribunate prompted concerns about personal political power. This became an increasingly pressing issue as leaders in the first century BC, such as Julius Caesar, were occasionally given tremendous powers to cope with foreign military challenges to Rome, only to refuse to relinquish those powers when they returned to civilian life. Following the events of 133 BC, a succession of escalating crises ensued. Gaius Marius, a spectacularly successful soldier, vanquished adversaries in Africa, Gaul, and eventually Italy, when Rome's allies in Italy rose against her at the close of the century. He held the highest state post, the consulship, seven times, achieving an unprecedented level of long-term political domination. Marius subsequently clashed with Lucius Cornelius Sulla, another Roman warrior, who, following successes in the east, marched on Rome in 82 BC and declared himself 'dictator.' This was an ancient Roman post created to grant a powerful politician temporary powers in the event of an emergency. Sulla, unlike Julius Caesar, who would become dictator 40 years later, resigned from his position and died in his bed. Violence in the city, as well as fighting between gangs backing competing politicians and political programs, characterized the middle years of the first century BC. Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus (nicknamed 'Pompey the Great' after Alexander the Great) and Julius Caesar were the two main characters. Pompey enjoyed the backing of the traditionalists, while Caesar pushed radical measures in the style of Tiberius Gracchus. Historians in both the ancient and modern worlds have spent a lot of time trying to figure out how these two individuals ended up fighting in civil war. But the reality is that, given their respective levels of strength and ingrained rivalry, war was nearly unavoidable. There wasn't going to be much 'liberty' after that. Instead, another decade of civil war ensued, as Caesar's followers first fought his assassins, then fought amongst themselves when they were dispatched.
