This is false.
Syntax deals with word order and relations between words. Sounds and letters are parts of Phonetics.
Answer:
well hardware is 1
device is 2
3 is solve
4 is affordable
5 is play around with
6 is open source
7 is software
and I'm gonna leave you with that to try and figure out the rest! if you still need help feel free to just ask me and I'll answer.
Explanation:
Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor and the 1986 Nobel Peace Prize stands in front of a room full of important government people; he wants his audience to recognize that being indifferent is not the same as being innocent – indifference, “after all, is more dangerous than anger or hatred”.
He forces the listeners to wonder which kind of people they are. To him, during the Holocaust, people fit into one of “three simple categories: the killers, the victims, and the bystanders” and he forces the bystanders to decide whether or not to stay indifferent to the actual situation. He takes the time to list various actual civil wars and humanitarian crises (line 17 of his speech) and contrast them with WWII.
He makes sure that his audience realise what is at stake “Indifference, then, is not only a sin, it is a punishment” [for mankind]. He wants the audience to be really affected by what they hear – so he talks to them in their condition of human being: “Is it necessary at times to practice [indifference] simply to … enjoy a fine meal and a glass of wine”. And he also talks to them as government people with their duty and the power they have over the actual conflicts. He wants them to compare themselves with their predecessors during WWII: “We believed that the leaders of the free world did not know what was going on … And now we knew, we learned, we discovered that the Pentagon knew, the State Department knew.”
Wiesel finishes his speech by expressing hope for the new millennium. We believed he addresses these final words to those who will refuse to stay indifferent. But it seems that Wiesel would count them in the minority: “Some of them -- so many of them -- could be saved.” probably refers to this minority.
Esawar Prasad's article “The Future of Money” is published in a magazine. According to the article, the nodes are used to store and share transactional records. Thus, option b is accurate.
<h3>What is blockchain in bitcoin?</h3>
Bitcoin is digital money, and blockchain is the log not centralized for the dealings that happen across the network. They do not require any central authority to clear the transactions.
Nodes and blocks are an integral part of the blockchain that stores the data and are interconnected to run the core of the cryptocurrency. The transactional information is stored and encrypted in the nodes and blocks of the blockchain.
Therefore, option b. node share information in the form of blocks is accurate.
Learn more about blockchain and cryptocurrency here:
brainly.com/question/23956699
#SPJ1
I've looked this question up online. The options are simply:
a. First Person
b. Second Person
c. Third Person
Answer:
The point of view in this paragraph is:
a. First person.
Explanation:
The narrator of the excerpt is telling the story from a first-person point of view. The easiest way to confirm that is by taking a look at the pronouns used:
The dew on the grass made my running shoes damp. It didn't bother me. The sound of my feet hitting the street formed a rhythm, a steady pattern of light thumps. I timed my
breathing with the rhythm.
<u>First-person narrators use first-person pronouns such as "I" and "me". This type of narrator gives us his/her own perspective on things. That means we accompany this narrator throughout the story, see things from his perspective, and only get to know what he knows. One advantage of first-person point of view is that we get to dive deeper into the narrator's feelings and thoughts. One disadvantage is that he is a biased narrator, which makes him untrustworthy.</u>
