Yes, because morally, it’s the right thing to do. Our common humanity means that those of us who are doing well (often doing <em>too</em> well) should help those whose basic needs are not met. And, in part, our personal and national wealth has often been created by the exploitation of poor people – colonial extraction of resources, the slavery and opium trades, unfair international trade and finance practices and others. Reallocating just <em>1% of global wealth</em> would eradicate extreme income poverty at a stroke. Those of us who are ‘better-off’ would be stupid not to help the poor. If we want a prosperous, politically stable and environmentally sustainable world for ourselves (and for future generations), then we have to help poor people in poorer, less fortunate lands.
Hope this helps, honey. Best of luck with assignments like these.
With respect to moral leadership, the problem in the widespread electric-powered case can fine be characterized as The leadership style of the executives.
Outline ethical leadership. show of normatively appropriate behavior thru private actions and interpersonal relationships, and merchandising of behavior to followers via -way verbal exchange, reinforcement, and selection making.
Leaders who have ethical conduct awareness of having exact communication that is honest and open with every single man or woman of their employer. Manages pressure efficaciously. Leaders and executives are faced with disturbing situations every day, each of their painting's lifestyles and their private existence.
Preserving admiration for others and equally around the team and company is every other example of moral leadership. Egalitarian treatment of their peers is key, there may be no favoritism being performed out and no sick treatment of any member of personnel thru any form of discrimination.
Learn more about ethical leadership here: brainly.com/question/13383200
#SPJ4
