Schenectady County, New York
Answer:
The awnser is that it is a metaphor
Explanation:
<h2>
BRAINLIEST PLEASE</h2>
Is it dynasty? im not sure though
<span>Supreme Court of Oregon affirmed. Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. It was used to justify both sex discrimination and usage of labor laws. ... The ruling had important implications for protective labor legislation.</span>
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
