The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can say that the ethical standard that waiting to propose the study violates is "Informed Consent to Research."
In this case, Professor Hammond, first, had to inform the students about the study she was doing so the students were aware of this situation is class. So once she notified the class about her research, then ask them their consent to participate in the study. They probably had to sign a document that serves as an agreement of their participation. The students then would be aware of the details of the research and they would decide if they want to be part of the study. That is the ethical way to proceed.
Peer pressure and want to fit in with others
Answer:
The most significant common law system are the law pattern which are developed by the judges are based on the precedent by the case decision. The common law is also known as the judge decision law where it is derived from the decision of judicial and the court.
The basic purpose of the common law system are providing the legal ideas for the contextual areas. It is developed by the court decision rather than on the law which are statutory .
Stapleton indicated in the <u>Critical Deaf Theory</u> that audism is a phenomenon that is socially constructed and posits that audism occurs regularly. This is closely linked to deficit error.
<h3>What is Audism?</h3>
This is the practice of discriminating against people who have hearing challenges. This prejudice may occur in the following ways:
- trying to assist people who are deaf to communicate:
- asking a person with hearing challenges to read one's lips or write against their wish or preferred mode of communication
- refusing to get an interpreter at the request of a deaf person.
Audism is very similar to Deficit Error.
Please see the link below for more about Deficit Error:
brainly.com/question/8412510
