1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horrorfan [7]
3 years ago
10

True or false?If an agent contracts with a third party without authority from the principal, the is not liable on the contract.

If the third party knows of the existence of a principal, either disclosed or partially disclosed, then the is liable to the third party who relied on the agency status. In this situation, there is a breach of the warranty of authority. If the third party knows that the agent does not have authority, then the agent liable to the third party.
Law
1 answer:
DedPeter [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

true

Explanation:

The true statement if an agent has no actual or apparent authority to act on behalf of a principal but the agent still enters into a contract with a third party

The principal will not be bound except if the contract has been ratified by the principal.

You might be interested in
The recent collapse of some banks and financial institutions and the merger of others in ghana is proof that the financial syste
Dmitry [639]

Answer:in my opinion some of the problems can be resolved by haing more markets be run by the country so that they can have proper insurance and so the taxtes help flow back into the country.

Explanation:if u have insurance what u lose u can at least get some back and the taxes help the countrys financial problems wich also help u.

8 0
3 years ago
4
wolverine [178]

Answer:

10th i did the quiz already and passed

8 0
3 years ago
Patricia Plaintiff files a lawsuit against Donald Defendant for breach of contract. The law that governs the subject area of her
MrMuchimi

Explanation:

state statutory and common (judge-made) law and private law.

4 0
3 years ago
List three reasons to keep sovereign immunity
Levart [38]
Sovereign immunity takes two forms: (1) immunity from suit (also known as immunity from jurisdiction or adjudication) and (2) immunity from enforcement. The former prevents the assertion of the claim; the latter prevents even a successful litigant from collecting on a judgment,
7 0
2 years ago
Justices practice judicial restraint when they
Degger [83]
Make rulings that change the laws passed by congress.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 4. Which of the following is NOT a professional communication channel?
    6·1 answer
  • For laws against shoplifting, pick at least one of the four grounds for justification—legal moralism, the harm principle, legal
    9·1 answer
  • What is declares war branch of government leslislative,executive or judicial
    11·2 answers
  • What's an example of the substitution effect?​
    10·1 answer
  • As citizens, we have both freedoms and which of the following?
    9·1 answer
  • Determine if the statement is true or false.
    11·2 answers
  • Seven more than a number, x, is at least 20
    15·1 answer
  • According to the video, what are some examples of licenses and permissions regulated by Licensing Examiners and Inspectors? Chec
    6·2 answers
  • CAN U PLS HELP ME . ASAP. PLS<br><br>PLSSSSSSSSS. thank you. ​
    10·1 answer
  • Although the judge in trial court may have rendered a decision, for what reason can a person convicted of a crime appeal to the
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!