Answer:
The stock price is 38.63
Explanation:
We use the gordon model to calculate the horizon value and with htat the value of the stock:

D1 = 2.60 x 1.04 = 2.704
rate of return 11% = 0.11
grow rate = 4% = 0.04

P0 = 38.62857143
The taxes should be ignored as the gordon model do not include them in the calculations
Answer:
The right approach is Option C (global minimum variance portfolio).
Explanation:
- A completely-invested portfolio with either a low uncertainty factor seems to be the GMV portfolio. This same GMV portfolio corresponds to or is situated mostly on the left end including its FI-efficient frontier.
- Although aside from either the full-investment requirement, no restrictions are enforced, the GMV portfolio deals for analytical portrayal.
The latter options offered are not relevant to something like the scenario presented. So that is indeed the correct solution.
Answer:
Marketing synergies
Explanation:
Marketing synergies refers to the combination of two or more marketing initiatives that produces an effect that is greater than the sum of the results of implementing each of them alone. Also, this helps to save money by combining the efforts. According to this, the answer is that this allows Apple to enjoy cost savings due to marketing synergies because the professional segment of medium/large businesses is interested in purchasing all of the items in the product line which allows to create synergies.
Answer:
above $3.00
Explanation:
A price ceiling is when the government or an agency of the government sets the maximum price for a good or service. A price ceiling is non binding if it set above equilibrium price. So price above $3 is non binding. A non binding price ceiling has no effect on the market price.
Price ceiling is binding if it is set below equilibrium price.
Equilibrium price is where the demand and supply curve intersects.
I hope my answer helps you
An organizational characteristics that tend to lead to larger sub-optimization problems is continuous focus on optimizing a unit of a business rather than the results of the entire business
<h3>What is Sub-optimization?</h3>
In a firm. the term "Sub-optimization" occurs when there is reduced level of output as a result of an an inefficient or ineffective process or system.
The problem associated with Sub-optimization is that when there is an optimization of outcome for a subsystem, it may not generally optimize the outcome for the system as a whole.
In conclusion, the organizational characteristics that tend to lead to larger sub-optimization problems is continuous focus on optimizing a unit of a business rather than the results of the entire business
Read more about Sub-optimization
<em>brainly.com/question/17083176</em>