1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Basile [38]
3 years ago
7

Why were colonists upset by the Proclamation of 1763?​

History
1 answer:
Anit [1.1K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The Royal Proclamation of 1763 was very unpopular with the colonists. ... This angered the colonists. They felt the Proclamation was a plot to keep them under the strict control of England and that the British only wanted them east of the mountains so they could keep an eye on them.

You might be interested in
The material assets of the north during the civil war:
klasskru [66]
<span>The material assets of the North during the Civil War became more effective during the long run. Meaning, the assets were not immediately beneficial, but rather, paid off after time had passed. The assets included the beginning of new markets of selling products and for production of products and labor. There were different and new types of raw materials as well as a new frame of mind that added to the interest in democracy.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Which law in the constitution was supposedly broken
scZoUnD [109]

Answer:

They are all broken at some point what class is this for

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
30 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT
UNO [17]

Answer: Democracy was having an important role in history, because the Greeks had an important role (political), which led them to developed democracy. Also, Romans had an important role by adding a representative government. As you know people lived under the rule of kings and other rulers who held the power.Mar 23, 2015

Explanation:

Hope i helped!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were Daniel Morgan and his militia able to defeat the vastly
Kisachek [45]

Answer:

guerilla tactics

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
if anti-slavery Northerners had stood against slavery at the constitutional convection would the United States as we know it tod
kirill [66]
Probably not because without slavery ending we would still be at war 4 it and all of the usa would fall apart
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did richard nixon want to have better relations with china
    12·1 answer
  • Why did fundamentalism gain popularity in 1920
    7·1 answer
  • Which best describes why trade was difficult during Washington’s first term as president? There was a trade embargo on US ports.
    8·2 answers
  • Which amendment insurance that a person accused of a crime has a right to speedy trial
    14·2 answers
  • John Locke believed that man without government was
    8·1 answer
  • Which form of democracy works only on a local level
    8·1 answer
  • Were people treated relatively equally in the Roman Republic?
    9·1 answer
  • Match the following terms with the correct definition
    12·1 answer
  • Wilsons fourteen points called for creation of?
    7·2 answers
  • Which Amendment has been violated?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!