One of the biggest ethical risks in supply chain management is that the <u>most visible</u> supply chain member tends to be the one that suffers the blame and/or lost goodwill when something goes wrong.most visible.
<h3>What is ethical risk?</h3>
- In reaction to their unethical behaviors, actors end up externalizing their locus of control, as if they had no other choice.
- In this manner, actors reduce their own power to identify a profitable alternative course of action. They reduce their freedom to choose.
- On the other hand, inclusive awareness of ethical and unethical aspects triggers a natural search for more ethical actions (Cf. Psychological attitudes towards ethical dissonance).
- A rational analysis of the interest of such a more ethical alternative allows avoiding exaggeration of its costs (without proper analysis, a typical justification of an unethical action is that an alternative course of action would be too costly).
- Further, awareness of potential ethical costs increases the relative attractiveness of an alternative more ethical action. The re-framing of the situation allows the identification of new opportunities otherwise hidden to the actors.
To learn more about ethical risk from the given link
brainly.com/question/8377024
#SPJ4
Answer:
c. Exchange creates value by moving goods from parties who value them less to parties who value them more.
Explanation:
Exchange is described as the process of changing some goods for some other goods.
Exchange clearly provides you with the goods you value for, and in exchange for those goods you pay the goods you do not value.
This, results in adding value to the goods acquired by you, and adds value to the goods given by you for the person to whom it is exchanges.
As for example when a cloth is purchased by me for $100 then such adds the value to cloth and because it was worth less than $100 for the seller it has added value to the cloth.
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
This starts getting into the question of morality, I don't believe it is right and just like if a child were brought to a daycare where I worked with bruises and symptoms of neglect, I would report it. you also have a legal obligation too and if it ended up coming out then you would be held accountable as well.
It is the mantle that protects the visceral mass making up the body organs. In addition, the mantles secrete a specific compound named calcium carbonate and conchiolin, which are very essential for the creation of shells protecting the organism against its harsh environments.
