Question 1(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)

1 answer:

5 0

The correct answer is “The judicial power ought to be distinct from both the legislative and executive, and independent upon both, that so it may be a check upon both, as both should be checks upon that.” – John Adams.

This would be the correct answer because in this quote John Adams highlights the idea that the independence of the judicial power allows for checks and balances between the three powers.

The term "Separation of powers" refers to a system in which a state organizes and divides responsibilities. Creating three different branches which are: the judicial power, the legislative power and the executive power. In this way each branch carries out their responsibilities independently, promoting a checks and balances system that prevents any of the branches from taking over or interrupting in the other branches' functions.

You might be interested in

Is it true Most people in Latin America practice no religion

melomori [17]

Answer:

this is false

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

As a result of a lack of interstate economic cooperation, representatives from five states met in Annapolis, Maryland, in 1786 t

jeka94

Answer:

Constitutional convention in Philadelphia

Explanation:

During the Annapolis convention that was held in Maryland, in 1786, in which twelve delegates came from five states to seek a solution to the fundamental issues concerning lack of interstate economic cooperation. They eventually agreed to the further extensive Constitutional Convention which was later held in 1787 in Philadelphia.

Hence, in this case, the correct answer is "Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia"

8 0

2 years ago

Under Ramses, the Egyptians regained territory by warring and

NISA [10]

1. Peace treaty, Hities King.

2. Temples, economy

3. Libyians, Kushikos, and Assyrians.

7 0

3 years ago

Who discovered America before Columbus ?

KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure it was the Vikings

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Describe why much of Southwest Asia became part of European mandates after World War I, and explain the consequences of the mand

erica [24]

Answer: i hope this helps i think its to long but just copy what you need

A League of Nations mandate was a legal status for certain territories transferred from the control of one country to another following World War I, or the legal instruments that contained the internationally agreed-upon terms for administering the territory on behalf of the League of Nations. These were of the nature of both a treaty and a constitution, which contained minority rights clauses that provided for the rights of petition and adjudication by the International Court.[1]

The mandate system was established under Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, entered into force on 28 June 1919. With the dissolution of the League of Nations after World War II, it was stipulated at the Yalta Conference that the remaining Mandates should be placed under the trusteeship of the United Nations, subject to future discussions and formal agreements. Most of the remaining mandates of the League of Nations (with the exception of South-West Africa) thus eventually became United Nations Trust Territories.

Two governing principles formed the core of the Mandate System, being non-annexation of the territory and its administration as a “sacred trust of civilization” to develop the territory for the benefit of its native people.[2]

4 0

2 years ago