Answer and Explanation:
Given:
Total car = 200
Rate = $29
Computation:
Total increase in rate = a
So , Total decrees in car = 5a
Total income (y) = [200-5a][29+a]
y = 5,800 + 200a - 145a - 5a²
y = 5,800 + 55a - 5a²
y' = dy / da [5,800 + 55a - 5a²]
y' = -10a + 55
in which , y' = 0
0 = -10a + 55
a = 5.5
So , Maximum rate = $ [29+5.5]
Maximum rate = $34.5
maximum income = 5,800 + 55(5.5)- 5(5.5)²
maximum income = 5,800 + 302.5 - 151.25
maximum income = $5951.25
Answer:
c. It hopes to make more money available for loans
hope this helps!
add me/mark brainist<3
Answer:
e.$8,000 of fixed costs and $108,000 of variable costs.
Explanation:
Fixed costs don't change with a change in production volume, therefore, fixed costs remain $8,000.
The cost per unit to produce 15,000 units is:
Assuming a new production volume of 18,000 units, budgeted variable costs are:
The budgeted amounts are: e.$8,000 of fixed costs and $108,000 of variable costs.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "E": Perceptual defense.
Explanation:
In psychology, perceptual defense refers to the suppression of a stimulus that represents a threat or an uncomfortable situation for an individual. Those inputs are distorted somehow by the individual to reject the unpleasant feeling so that the person does not feel that bad because of it. In such a way, the brain works as a defense mechanism able to distort information to mitigate the effects in the behavior produced by the stimulus.
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
