Select these that apply as matters on which the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church agreed:
A. belief in one God
B. belief in Christ the Savior
G. the Gospels as Scripture
Some detail about what differed between the two sides and why they ended up splitting in what became known as "The Great Schism."
Mainly the Great Schism was caused by disputes over authority in the church. There were also doctrinal issues of dispute. For instance, the East objected to the addition of the Latin word "filioque" (meaning "and the Son") to the Nicene Creed, in which churches in the West confessed that the Holy Spirit proceeded from the Father and the Son (rather than from the Father alone, as confessed in the East). The West objected to the worship given to icons in the Eastern churches. There were also language differences, since Greek was the language of the church in the East and Latin the language of the church in the West.
Ultimately, though, the biggest reason was the struggle over authority in the church. In 1054 CE, there were mutual declarations of excommunication between the pope (in Rome) and the patriarch (in Constantinople) that resulted in "The Great Schism" -- a monumental split between the western church (the Roman Catholic Church and what has become known as the Eastern Orthodox Church. "Catholic" means universal -- the Roman pope was intent on asserting his leadership over all of Christendom. "Orthodox" means "right teaching." The Eastern patriarch and church were asserting their teachings to be right over against positions held in the West. There were a number of doctrinal issues debated hotly between East and West over the centuries leading up to final break between the two halves of the church. But more than anything, the split came down to "church power" -- who held control over the church.
Hi there,
The biggest effect of the French and Indian War was that it taught the 13 American colonies how to fight together. Before this war there was a mutual distrust between the thirteen. The next common foe would be Great Britain in the American Revolution.
This war also left Great Britain in extreme financial trouble within their military which of course will be a huge advantage for the colonists in the Revolution.
Great Britain tried to tax the colonists to make some money to be able to afford their military but this backfired when the colonists asked for representation in parliament-were denied- and started tossing tea off ships in Boston.
<span>Therefore, we can really thank the French and Indian War for paving the way to our freedom. </span>
Answer:
The record of the Beale treasure story given in Ward's 1885 handout is a main story, and that the treasure in Bed ford Area, Virginia, was covered there by the amazing semi legitimate privateer, Jean Lafitte (Laffite).
I acknowledge that Lafitte had a treasure that he wished to hide.
There is no proof to recommend that Lafitte was keen on ensuring a treasure for his beneficiaries or for the beneficiaries of his men. Normally, he would wish to ensure such a treasure for himself and his family, however that could be taken care of without a requirement for a mind boggling plan to circulate the treasure to a named rundown of beneficiaries. Best case scenario, the treasure story could give a cover to clarify the treasure's birthplace, and hence give it authenticity.
Basically, quite a prepared story could be used as a way to "wash" Lafitte's amassed wealth.
There are even stories that the treasure was not deliberately hidden. A few records state that the treasure was ready one of Lafitte's vessels and sank to the sea floor after a wreck.
Explanation:
All through Lafitte's occasions as a bootlegger and privateer, he turned out to be exceptionally affluent. His treasure comprised of the cash he would get in return for his unfamiliar merchandise just as the treasures left on the vendor delivers that he caught.
It is as yet hazy why Lafitte needed to cover his treasure or even where he was most recently seen. A few antiquarians relate that Lafitte returned to an existence of wrongdoing, leaving the US no decision except for to seek after his capture. With the danger of detainment and the dread of being caught, Lafitte purportedly covered his treasure with the objective to by and by sidestep U.S. seizure and to return to it later.
Answer:
William Graham Sumner became a leading proponent of Social Darwinism, arguing that the wealthy were rich because of natural selection and argued that their wealth was a social service. Sumner argued that hereditary wealth allowed the fittest to pass on their virtues to children.
Explanation:
<span>Dunkirk is your answer</span>