Kersaint and Saint-Maurice's arguments were different from that of the nationalists because:
- The nationalists argued that only the people that were born in the nation and had a shared history were to be regarded as citizens within the country.
<h3>Who were the nationalists?</h3>
These group of people were those that were regarded as the free men of color. They wanted a country were people would be free and have same rights.
The country of Haiti was under the colonization of the French at the time. Kersaints wanted the black to have their freedom only after they had met with certain conditions.
Saint Maurice on the other hand wanted the people to have equal rights and freedom . He wanted a situation where no body would be under the mercy of another.
Read more on Saint Dominique here:
brainly.com/question/6169880?referrer=searchResults
Restrictions on free speech as based on content were one of the issues discussed in the <span>New York Times Co. v. Sullivan and Texas v. Johnson. The first landmark first initiated the anti malice standard which establishes slander on government officials which has also the same principle as of Texas v. Johnson.</span>
Emilia Earhart is one person who made a difference<span />
Answer:
primary, it was written in that time period by someone there who experienced
