This story is<em> “To Kill a Mockingbird”, </em>written by Harper Lee. The children Jem and Scout Finch live in Maycomb and they witness how their father Atticus Finch defends a black man Tom Robinson. They know he is not guilty, but the jury is prejudiced against black men. In the courtroom, as the jury comes to deliver the verdict, Scout remembers how Atticus told her that a jury never looks at a man they have convicted. Neither of the 12 members of the jury looked at Tom Robinson.
Question: Which of the following best assists readers in inferring that the jury will announce a unanimous guilty verdict?
Answer: <u><em>4. Scout’s dreamlike impression that matched what she knew about juries—that they never look at a defendant when they have voted to convict—gave a strong hint about the guilty verdict
</em></u>
Answer:
They expanded the definition of the right to free speech beyond the spoken word
Explanation:
"Tinker v. Des Moines case" was all about the<em> black armbands</em> that a group of students wore as a form of expression in <em>protesting against the war</em><em> </em><em>that was happening in Vietnam. </em>They were suspended and this sparked a debate regarding the "freedom of speech" enclosed in the <em>Constitution.</em><em> </em>
As a result, <em>the right to free speech</em> was properly addressed by the Supreme Court as something that will allow the students to express themselves<u> without affecting the policy of the school.</u>
So, this explains the answer.
Answer:
The author's use of exposition creates a turning point in the story when Bella finds the message asking her to meet the letter writer in the park. This event introduces the main characters, Bella and her family, and sets the scene for the action that follows. The exposition also provides a resolution to the events that happen in the story: the identity of the letter writer. Furthermore, the author's use of exposition builds the tension that occurs in the story: the mystery behind the letters Bella finds.
Explanation:
