1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dexar [7]
3 years ago
13

Modern houses are more __ , but have higher levels of indoor pollution because of it

History
1 answer:
saw5 [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Energy-Efficient!!!!

Explanation:

a p e x putas

You might be interested in
(MC)What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)?
Fudgin [204]

Answer:

Affirmative action programs became more common

Explanation:

took test

7 0
3 years ago
Describe the government that existed in ancient Athens.
Amanda [17]

Answer:

Athens in the 5th to 4th century BCE had an extraordinary system of government: democracy. Under this system, all male citizens had equal political rights, freedom of speech, and the opportunity to participate directly in the political arena.

Explanation:

hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following people is not correctly matched to the industry or
Helga [31]
The correct answer to the person who was wrongly matched to the industry he was supposedly involved with in this case would be C - Gustavus Swift as he did not fund and found a tobacco empire. He did, however, create a meat-packaging empire. 
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a difference between the policies of Roosevelt and those of Taft?
Kay [80]
 I think the answer is A
7 0
4 years ago
What was president carters response to the soviet unions invasion of Afghanistan in 1979
Aliun [14]
I come to you this evening to discuss the extremely important and rapidly changing circumstances in Southwest Asia. . . .

. . . Massive Soviet military forces have invaded the small, nonaligned, sovereign nation of Afghanistan, which had hitherto not been an occupied satellite of the Soviet Union.

Fifty thousand heavily armed Soviet troops have crossed the border and are now dispersed throughout Afghanistan, attempting to conquer the fiercely independent Muslim people of that country.

The Soviets claim, falsely, that they were invited into Afghanistan to help protect that country from some unnamed outside threat. But the President, who had been the leader of Afghanistan before the Soviet invasion, was assassinated – along with several members of his family – after the Soviets gained control of the capital city of Kabul. Only several days later was the new puppet leader even brought into Afghanistan by the Soviets.

This invasion is an extremely serious threat to peace because of the threat of further Soviet expansion into neighboring countries in Southwest Asia and also because such an aggressive military policy is unsettling to other peoples throughout the world.

This is a callous violation of international law and the United Nations Charter. It is a deliberate effort of a powerful atheistic government to subjugate an independent Islamic people.

We must recognize the strategic importance of Afghanistan to stability and peace. A Soviet-occupied Afghanistan threatens both Iran and Pakistan and is a steppingstone to possible control over much of the world’s oil supplies.

The United States wants all nations in the region to be free and to be independent. If the Soviets are encouraged in this invasion by eventual success, and if they maintain their dominance over Afghanistan and then extend their control to adjacent countries, the stable, strategic, and peaceful balance of the entire world will be changed. This would threaten the security of all nations including, of course, the United States, our allies, and our friends.

Therefore, the world simply cannot stand by and permit the Soviet Union to commit this act with impunity. Fifty nations have petitioned the United Nations Security Council to condemn the Soviet Union and to demand the immediate withdrawal of all Soviet troops from Afghanistan.

. . . [N]either the United States nor any other nation which is committed to world peace and stability can continue to do business as usual with the Soviet Union.

I have already recalled the United States Ambassador from Moscow back to Washington. He’s working with me and with my other senior advisers in an immediate and comprehensive evaluation of the whole range of our relations with the Soviet Union.

The successful negotiation of the SALT II treaty1 has been a major goal and a major achievement of this administration, and we Americans, the people of the Soviet Union, and indeed the entire world will benefit from the successful control of strategic nuclear weapons through the implementation of this carefully negotiated treaty.

However, because of the Soviet aggression, I have asked the United States Senate to defer further consideration of the SALT II treaty so that the Congress and I can assess Soviet actions and intentions and devote our primary attention to the legislative and other measures required to respond to this crisis. As circumstances change in the future, we will, of course, keep the ratification of SALT II under active review in consultation with the leaders of the Senate.

The Soviets must understand our deep concern. We will delay opening of any new American or Soviet consular facilities, and most of the cultural and economic exchanges currently under consideration will be deferred. Trade with the Soviet Union will be severely restricted. . . .

Along with other countries, we will provide military equipment, food, and other assistance to help Pakistan defend its independence and its national security against the seriously increased threat it now faces from the north. The United States also stands ready to help other nations in the region in similar ways.

Neither our allies nor our potential adversaries should have the slightest doubt about our willingness, our determination, and our capacity to take the measures I have outlined tonight. I have consulted with leaders of the Congress, and I am confident they will support legislation that may be required to carry out these measures.

History teaches, perhaps, very few clear lessons. But surely one such lesson learned by the world at great cost is that aggression, unopposed, becomes a contagious disease. . . .
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 2. What was the northwest ordinance
    14·1 answer
  • Which court hears cases that have national significance
    11·1 answer
  • In which direction did the Corps of Discovery travel as they moved from St. Louis to the Oregon Coast?​
    10·1 answer
  • Describe the experiment of the Columbus Iselin. Did it support or disprove John Martin\'s hypothesis?
    6·1 answer
  • The dispute regarding the nature of Christ was discussed at the _____.
    7·2 answers
  • What best represents a nativist attitude toward the influx of immigrants around 1900
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the united states support rebel groups to declare their independence from Colombia and from the country of Panama?
    12·1 answer
  • How do languages within a language group relate to each other
    12·1 answer
  • The Roman government was established as a _____.
    12·2 answers
  • What map feature is located at 35 degrees N, 90 degrees W?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!