Answer:
i have a book so i know it right the government did not thing he ran away from the atkkt
Explanation:
Answer:
D. They had a rate of cognitive impairment several times higher than the children adopted at less than 6 months of age.
Explanation:
In the research study, titled "Child-to-adult neurodevelopmental and mental health trajectories after early life deprivation: the young adult follow-up of the longitudinal English and Romanian Adoptees study" using the data from the English and Romanian Adoptees study to assess whether deprivation-associated adverse neurodevelopmental and mental health outcomes persist into young adulthood.
It was concluded among other conclusions that regarding cognitive development for the children who were adopted when they were older than six months of age they had a rate of cognitive impairment several times higher than the children adopted less than six months of age.
Published on February 2017, the research study was carried out by Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke et al. It was summarily concluded that Time-limited, early-life exposures to institutional deprivation are factors characterized with disorders in childhood.
Answer:
its plot!!
Explanation:
i took the quiz, and plot is correct!
The direct democracy or pure democracy it´s a form of democracy in which the people directly decides on policy initiatives, it differs from the representative democracy; the one that it´s currently established in the majority of the countries; because in that the people choose the representantives and they are those who decide the policies to carry on. In the representative democracy the people do not govern, it´s a common mistake to mix both concepts.
Two different forms of direct democracy are participatory democracy and deliberative democracy. The deliberative democracy is a form in which the deliberation it´s a central matter to the decisions and it is seen as an amalgalm of the direct and the representative democracies. It holds that for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by an authentic deliberation not a mere voting.
The participatory democracy is one that emphasizes the broad participation of everybody but it demands to the citizens to be more involved in the political participation.
I think that a group taking a vote on something is an example of a participatory democracy because everyone have the same power to create consensus and, at last it would win the iniciative that obtain more votes. If the example was a representative democracy then the group would have to vote for only one person to make a decision and then the group will follow the "leader" choice althought it goes against the majority of what the group wants.
I hope the answer to be useful for you. Regards.
Answer:
Hacker
Explanation:
A hacker is a person who utilizes PC, organizing or different abilities to beat a specialized issue.
The term hacker may allude to anybody with specialized aptitudes, yet it frequently alludes to an individual who utilizes their capacities to increase unapproved access to frameworks or systems so as to carry out wrongdoings,
Hacker has generally been a troublesome one, some of the time being utilized as a term of adoration for a person who shows a high level of expertise, just as inventiveness in their way to deal with specialized issues.
