AnswerA
The narrator was sentenced to life in prison:
Explanation:
Answer:
A. Sonnet poem
Explanation:
An ode poem is a kind of poem, usually praising something. An ode is a form of lyric poetry — expressing emotion — and it's usually addressed to someone or something, or it represents the poet's musings on that person or thing.
In poetry, a sonnet has 14 lines, and each line has 10 syllables. Generally, sonnets are divided into different groups based on the rhyme scheme they follow.
Haiku is a traditional form of Japanese poetry. Haiku poems consist of 3 lines. The first and last lines of a Haiku have 5 syllables and the middle line has 7 syllables. Because Haikus are such short poems, they are usually written about things that are recognizable to the reader.
Answer:
A markup language is a language used to describe the content and structure of documents.
Explanation:
Markup Language is a structured computer language that lets you identify and use common elements of a document like headings, paragraphs, and lists. The two most popular markup languages nowadays are HTML and XML since they are used all over the internet and in most of the documents we work with every day.
Definition/Explanation Clues. Sometimes a word's or phrase's meaning is explained immediately after its use. ...
Restatement/Synonym Clues. Sometimes a hard word or phrase is said in a simple way. ...
Contrast/Antonym Clues. ...
Inference/General Context Clues. ...
Punctuation.
Answer:
It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.
Explanation:
When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others.
In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough.
He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that?
He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning.
After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong.
The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented.
