Answer:
As long as Mitch acted in good faith and tried to make the best possible decision regarding all available information, and his decision was something that any other person could have made, his mistake has to be considered a bad or negative business judgement (business judgement rule). He thought that his actions would benefit the corporation, but he was wrong and the corporation lost money. That types of mistakes are considered normal and just that, mistakes that anyone can make.
In regards with the second issue, that Mitch is a shareholder and a director of a firm that will directly compete with Numero Uno, he must inform the board about this and resign to either Numero Uno or One of a Kind.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option D: Both the foreseeable doctrine and the restatement doctrine.
Explanation:
On the one hand, the <em>foreseeable doctrine</em> dictates that there is a limit in the liability of party for those acts that he has done and that carry a risk of foreseeable harm. Therefore that this point of view establishes that a reasonable person would be able to understand and so to know when a certain action would bring certain damages to another party.
On the oher hand, the <em>restatement doctrine</em> establishes that there are a set of treatises on legal subjects that primarily are looking for to inform judges and lawyers about general principles of common law. And therefore that those treatises will help both the judge and the lawyers at the time of the trial when the person has to go to court.
Answer:
Explanation:
The current price of the bond can be calculated by using the formula:
You enforce the rules, state you did correctly count the amount of money, no exceptions.
Answer:
FV= $115,928.81
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Monthly deposit= $70
Interest rate= 0.12/12= 0.01
n= 24*12= 288
<u>To calculate the future value, we need to use the following formula:</u>
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= monthly deposit
FV= {70*[(1.01^288) - 1]} / 0.01
FV= $115,928.81
