Find the quotient for 7.868+1.4

Find the measure of angle 1

Andrei [34K]

The measure of angle 1 = 32°

Explanation:
Angle 1 = 1/2(102-38)

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is 245 the the power of 8?

vlabodo [156]

Answer:

1.2981614e+19

Step-by-step explanation:

you can always use a calculator for powers.

7 0

3 years ago

Each edge of a cube measures 12.1 in.<br><br> What is the surface area of the cube?

REY [17]

878.46 in. is your answer! Hope this helps!

8 0

3 years ago

A box contains three plain pencils and 5 pens. A second box contains three colored pencils and three crayons. One item from each

worty [1.4K]

Answer:

Therefore the probability that a pen from the first box and a crayon from the second box are selected is $\frac5{16}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Probability:

The ratio of the number of favorable outcomes to the number all possible outcomes of the event.

$Probability=\frac{\textrm{The number favorable outcomes}}{\textrm{The number all possible}}$

Given that,

Three plain pencils and 5 pens are contained by the first box.

Total number of pens and pencils is =(3+5)=8

The probability that a pen is selected from the first box is

=P(A)

$=\frac{\textrm{The number pens}}{\textrm{Total number of pens and pencils}}$

$=\frac{5}{8}$

A second box contains three colored pencils and three crayons.

Total number of pencils and crayons is =(3+3)=6

The probability that a crayon is selected from the second box is

=P(B)

$=\frac{\textrm{The number of crayon}}{\textrm{Total number of crayons and pencils}}$

$=\frac{3}{6}$

Since both events are mutually independent.

The required probability is multiple of the events

Therefore the required probability is

$=\frac58\times \frac36$

$=\frac5{16}$

4 0

3 years ago

A social psychologist predicted that ratings of an individual’s social desirability would be influenced by their physical attrac

marshall27 [118]

Answer:

It is stated in the query that the more attractive the individual, the higher their rank of desirability.

Step-by-step explanation:

This means that we should conclude that the alternative explanation of "higher degree of desire contributes to higher levels of social attractiveness"

In the event of a null hypothesis, we will believe that the degree of attractiveness has no impact on the score of cultural desirability.

(1) Null hypothesis:- The level of attraction does not have an impact on the rating of social desirability.

(2) Alternate hypothesis:- The level of attraction has a positive effect on the ranking of social desirability.

(3) The error of Type I is characterized as the rejection of the true null hypothesis. Therefore, in this case, the type I mistake would be that "the level of attraction has a positive effect on the rating of social desirability while the level of attraction does not have an impact on the rating of social desirability."

(4) The error of type II is characterized as the failure to reject the false null hypothesis. Thus, in this situation, the Type II error would be that "the level of attraction has no impact on the rating of social desirability while the real level of attraction has a positive effect on the rating of social desirability."

(5) We know that the likelihood of having a Form I error is equal to the degree of significance (in percent terms). The significance level, in this case, is 0.05, so the likelihood of making a form I error is 0.05 * 100=5 percent.

Therefore, there is a 5 percent risk of making a Type I mistake.

3 0

3 years ago